2005
DOI: 10.1063/1.1945130
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Status of the International Neutron Cross-Section Standards File

Abstract: A report is given of the progress achieved in an IAEA Co-ordinated Research Project (CRP) to improve the cross-section standards. The objectives of the CRP, started in 2002, were initially the understanding of the origin of the strong uncertainty reduction in R-matrix model fits and the improvement of the evaluation methodology. These aims were extended in 2003 to the preparation of new evaluations for the standard 6 Li(n,t), 10 B(n,α), 10 B(n,α 1 ), 197 Au(n,γ), 235 U(n,f), and 238 U(n,f) reactions. The metho… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The development of new standards is a complex international effort, including CSEWG in the United States, WPEC Subgroup 7 and an IAEA CRP on Standards [2,3]. These activities are closely intertwined.…”
Section: Neutron Cross-section Standards Sg7mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The development of new standards is a complex international effort, including CSEWG in the United States, WPEC Subgroup 7 and an IAEA CRP on Standards [2,3]. These activities are closely intertwined.…”
Section: Neutron Cross-section Standards Sg7mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…New evaluations will be prepared for 8 standard reactions 1 H(n,n), 3 He(n,p), 6 Li(n,t), 10 B(n,α), 10 B(n,α 1 ), 197 Au(n,γ), 235 U(n,f), and 238 U(n,f). In addition, 238 U(n,γ) and 239 Pu(n,f) will be evaluated because of strongly coupled databases with standards.…”
Section: Standardsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The CRP has made considerable progress; cross sections should be finalized in 2004, followed by covariances in 2005. See V. Pronyaev et al [3] for more details.…”
Section: Standardsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation