2020
DOI: 10.1103/physrevc.102.015801
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Status of the Mg24(α,γ)Si28 reaction rate at stellar temperatures

Abstract: Background: The 24 Mg(α, γ) 28 Si reaction influences the production of magnesium and silicon isotopes during carbon burning and is one of eight reaction rates found to significantly impact the shape of calculated X-ray burst light curves. The reaction rate is based on measured resonance strengths and known properties of levels in 28 Si. Purpose: It is necessary to update the astrophysical reaction rate for 24 Mg(α, γ) 28 Si incorporating recent modifications to the nuclear level data for 28 Si, and to determi… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, proton inelastic-scattering reactions at the energies used in the experiments described in this paper are not selective [28][29][30][31]. Therefore, unlike the previous resonance-reaction experimental studies of 19 F, we should populate most or all of the states present.…”
Section: Ex [Mev]mentioning
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In contrast, proton inelastic-scattering reactions at the energies used in the experiments described in this paper are not selective [28][29][30][31]. Therefore, unlike the previous resonance-reaction experimental studies of 19 F, we should populate most or all of the states present.…”
Section: Ex [Mev]mentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Some states listed in Table I at E x = 10.469 and 10.5656 MeV are not used in the fitting of the Q3D data. This could be because these states are not populated in the present reaction, which is unlikely given the non-selective nature of the (p, p ′ ) reaction at low energies [31], or because these states correspond to other known states which have been reported in different reactions. Other factors, such as revisions to the masses (and therefore particle thresholds), hinder the consistent identification of states between different experiments and may help to explain the discrepancies in the number and energy of the reported states.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Going beyond the introduction of SU (3) in SM by Elliott [1,2] that is applicable only to light nuclei, the scope of SU (3) in nuclei is enlarged, spreading its applicability all across the periodic chart, by the developments in the pseudo-SU (3) model [3,4], SU (3) of fermion dynamical symmetry model [5], proxy-SU (3) model [6] and the Sp(6, R) model containing SU (3) [7][8][9] all within the shell model on one hand and by various extended IBM's such as IBM-2,3,4 [10], sdgIBM [11,12], sdpf IBM [13,14], IBFM (interacting boson-fermion model) and IBFFM (interacting boson-fermion-fermion model) [15][16][17] on the other. In addition, there are the algebraic cluster model [18,19] and many other models that employ SU (3) symmetry. A new paradigm in the applications of SU (3) in nuclei is the recent recognition that for nucleons in a given oscillator shell η, there will be multiple SU (3) algebras [20,21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This means that the states populated in 23 Na are not being populated in resonance scattering but in some other, rather non-selective, reaction mechanism which appears to be compound in nature. This reaction has been used to study a number of different isotopes already, such as 31 P, 28 Si, 27 Al, 24,26 Mg, 23 Na, and 19 F [10][11][12][13][14][15][16].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%