13th Aerodynamic Testing Conference 1984
DOI: 10.2514/6.1984-624
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Status of three-dimensional adaptive-wall test section development at AEDC

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1985
1985
1988
1988

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This conclusion motivated the second three-dimensional AEDC pro gram (Parker & Erickson 1984, Kraft et al 1986, which was carried out in a one-foot-square test section having a total of 64 variable-porosity wall segments, distributed over all four walls, and controllable, uniform plenum-chamber pressure. In the tests reported, the 64 wall controls were operated in 14 groups.…”
Section: Tunnels With Deformable Impermeable Wallsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…This conclusion motivated the second three-dimensional AEDC pro gram (Parker & Erickson 1984, Kraft et al 1986, which was carried out in a one-foot-square test section having a total of 64 variable-porosity wall segments, distributed over all four walls, and controllable, uniform plenum-chamber pressure. In the tests reported, the 64 wall controls were operated in 14 groups.…”
Section: Tunnels With Deformable Impermeable Wallsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The AEDC adaptive waH test section and its control are described in more detail by Parker and Erickson (1982). At that time fully automated operation of the test section was scheduled for October 1982, but this has been somewhat delayed.…”
Section: D Test Sectmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is particularly important in concepts using 'adaptive ' or so-called 'smart' wind tunnels in which the walls are configured to achieve near free-field conditions. As described in Lock Sears (1974), and Parker & Erickson (1982), the adaptive approach involves an iterative adjustment of the wall shape with a feedback loop involving a prediction of the wall-model interaction, which may be based on a computational simulation. It is therefore evident that the practical feasibility of the method depends on the rapidity of response of the predictive part of the smart-wall procedure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%