2020
DOI: 10.1140/epja/s10050-020-00075-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Status on $$^{\mathbf {12}}\mathbf {C}+{}^{\mathbf {12}}{\mathbf {C}}$$ fusion at deep subbarrier energies: impact of resonances on astrophysical $$S^{*}$$ factors

Abstract: Since the discovery of molecular resonances in 12 C+ 12 C in the early sixties a great deal of research work has been undertaken to study α-clustering and resonant effects of the fusion process at sub-Coulomb barrier energies. The modified astrophysical S * factors of 12 C+ 12 C fusion have been extracted from direct fusion measurements at deep sub-barrier energies near the Gamow window. They were also obtained by the indirect Trojan horse method (THM). A comparison of direct measurements and the THM, which el… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
33
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Measurements of these have been performed at energies above E c.m. = 2.1 MeV, and three different extrapolation methods have been used to estimate the reaction cross section at lower energies (Beck, Mukhamedzhanov, & Tang 2020). Comparing to the standard rate CF88 from Caughlan & Fowler (1988), the indirect measurement using the Trojan Horse Method suggests an enhancement of the reaction rate due to a number of potential resonances in the unmeasured energy range (Tumino et al 2018), while the phenomenological 'hindrance model' suggests a greatly suppressed and lower rate (Jiang et al 2018).…”
Section: Uncertainties In the Relevant Reaction Ratesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Measurements of these have been performed at energies above E c.m. = 2.1 MeV, and three different extrapolation methods have been used to estimate the reaction cross section at lower energies (Beck, Mukhamedzhanov, & Tang 2020). Comparing to the standard rate CF88 from Caughlan & Fowler (1988), the indirect measurement using the Trojan Horse Method suggests an enhancement of the reaction rate due to a number of potential resonances in the unmeasured energy range (Tumino et al 2018), while the phenomenological 'hindrance model' suggests a greatly suppressed and lower rate (Jiang et al 2018).…”
Section: Uncertainties In the Relevant Reaction Ratesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…= 2.1 MeV with large uncertainties. Three different kinds of extrapolations have been used to estimate the reaction cross section at lower energies [192][193][194][195][196][197][198]. A recent 24 Mg(α, α ) 24 Mg experiment at RCNP provides important information for the resonances at stellar energies [199].…”
Section: Helium and Carbon Burningsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to this, there are resonant structures observed even at a very low energy region. As a result, large uncertainties persist in reaction rate while extrapolating the data at an astrophysically significant energy range (Beck et al (2020); Tan et al (2020)). So the experimental measurement of the fusion cross‐section for 12 C + 12 C fusion reaction has been limited to the energies above E c .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To extrapolate the data in the lower energy regions of astrophysical interest, the theoretical modeling of heavy‐ion 12 C + 12 C fusion reaction is necessary. Various phenomenological and microscopic models have been developed to explain the fusion dynamics of these heavy‐ion reactions (Beck et al (2020); Zhang et al (2020)). Further, to remove the effects arising due to the Coulomb barrier, the fusion cross‐section for astrophysical reactions is defined in terms of astrophysical S‐factor.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%