2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.labeco.2003.02.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Statutory firing costs and lay-offs in Canada

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While employment protection should unambiguously reduce job flows, in many models the theoretical impact of employment protection on employment levels is ambiguous, as higher firing costs reduce both firing and hiring(Bertola 1992). Recent research using worker-or firm-level data show is mixed, although there is some evidence that commonly adopted employment protection may reduce job mobility and employment (for important recent papers in this literature, seeKugler 1999, Hunt 2000, Bauer et al 2007, Friesen 2005, Kugler and Pica 2007, Autor et al 2006, Marinescu 2009). 7 In a series of more recent papers,Autor et al (2004Autor et al ( , 2006Autor et al ( and 2007 reconcile the conflicting findings from prior research and find evidence that one wrongful-discharge provision (i.e., the implied-contract exception) reduced…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While employment protection should unambiguously reduce job flows, in many models the theoretical impact of employment protection on employment levels is ambiguous, as higher firing costs reduce both firing and hiring(Bertola 1992). Recent research using worker-or firm-level data show is mixed, although there is some evidence that commonly adopted employment protection may reduce job mobility and employment (for important recent papers in this literature, seeKugler 1999, Hunt 2000, Bauer et al 2007, Friesen 2005, Kugler and Pica 2007, Autor et al 2006, Marinescu 2009). 7 In a series of more recent papers,Autor et al (2004Autor et al ( , 2006Autor et al ( and 2007 reconcile the conflicting findings from prior research and find evidence that one wrongful-discharge provision (i.e., the implied-contract exception) reduced…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our empirical strategy exploits the (a) changes in the strength in employment protection over time (i.e., the enactment of LSL in August 1984, the setting up of CLA in August 1987, and the enactment of LIL in February 1993), (b) sectoral difference in the coverage of EPL (i.e., Taiwan's LSL covered only some industries, which belong to the primary and secondary sectors of industry, and establishments in some industries, which mostly belong to the tertiary sector of industry, are not covered by LSL and are used as the control group), 20 and (c) differences in LSL enforcement intensity for LSLcovered establishments of difference sizes. 21 Accordingly, our empirical model is specified as follows.…”
Section: Empirical Strategy and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ Table 2 here] 20 More specifically, in our empirical analysis the covered industries include (1) manufacturing, (2) electricity, gas and water, (3) construction, and (4) transportation, storage and communications; and the industries not covered by LSL includes (1) trading, (2) wholesale, retail, traveler accommodation, and eating & drinking places, (3) finance and insurance (where banking and insurance establishments are excluded), (4) real estate, and rental & leasing services, (5) professional, scientific and technical services, (6) health care and social welfare services, (7) cultural, sports, and entertainment & recreation services; and (8) other services. 21 Smaller establishments' LSL compliance was loosely enforced.…”
Section: Empirical Strategy and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is a literature, complementary to the studies cited here, that analyzes the effects of SP on employment flows. In work subsequent to her 1996 paper, Friesen [2005] reports that severance pay laws have little impact on the flows into and out of employment in Canada. In his study, Martins [2009] also assesses the impact of the reform on worker turnover rates, and finds that the effects are not statistically significant.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%