2013
DOI: 10.5755/e01.9786090208670
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Statybinių nerūdinių medžiagų gavyba, perdirbimas ir naudojimas

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Studies benchmarking various methods have exposed serious limitations in even the most advanced approaches [6][7][8][9]. Although the methodology for accurately solving the three-body scattering problem is under intense research, there are at least two less-tractable sources of uncertainty in the calculation of transfer reaction observables, namely the reduction of the many-body problem to a three-body problem and the uncertainties in the effective interactions introduced as a consequence of that reduction [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies benchmarking various methods have exposed serious limitations in even the most advanced approaches [6][7][8][9]. Although the methodology for accurately solving the three-body scattering problem is under intense research, there are at least two less-tractable sources of uncertainty in the calculation of transfer reaction observables, namely the reduction of the many-body problem to a three-body problem and the uncertainties in the effective interactions introduced as a consequence of that reduction [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For evaluating the neutron-nucleus form factors in the Coulomb basis, we start from the separable partial-wave t-matrix operator given in Eq. (7). Evaluating its momentum space matrix elements p|t l (E)|p ′ in a plane-wave basis gives the nuclear form factors…”
Section: Coulomb Distorted Neutron-nucleus Form Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the last decade, many theoretical efforts have focused on advancing the theory for (d, p) reactions (e.g. [6,7]) and testing existing methods (e.g. [4,8,9]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using this type of correction, however, does not eliminate all background as the background does vary across the piece of CR-39. To allow for accurate correction for neutron-induced background, the background was experimentally established on a NULL shot (N130628, YDT=1.610 15 ) where MRS was fielded without a conversion foil. The background correction as determined on N130628 is now routinely applied to the MRS spectrum.…”
Section: Neutron Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(The validity of this approach is confirmed by the YDD/YDT ratios measured on the five SymCaps studied, which are in agreement with the values expected based on reactivities.) The DT-fuel component used to give DT fuel R was calculated on the basis of n,D, D(n,2n) 15 , n,T, 16 and T(n,2n) cross-sections, scaled for simulated emission profile effects 17 , and the CH-ablator component used to give CH-ablator R was calculated using MCNPX for an implosion with 440 mg/cm 2 CH-ablator R, Tion=2.9 keV and SymCap-like geometry, to account for multiscatter and profile effects. From the spectrum shown in Fig.…”
Section: Fig 2 (Color Online) (A) Reduced Mrs Spectrum For Shot N1mentioning
confidence: 99%