2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.fss.2014.05.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

std-Convergence in fuzzy metric spaces

Abstract: In this note we answer two recent questions posed by Morillas and Sapena [On Cauchy sequences in fuzzy metric spaces, Proceedings of the Conference in Applied Topology WiAT'13 101-108] related to standard convergence in fuzzy metric spaces in the sense of George and Veeramani. The obtained results lead us to establish what conditions must satisfy a concept about sequential convergence to be considered compatible with a concept of Cauchyness.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We begin recalling a notion of contractive mapping introduced by Mihet in [15]. It was adapted by Gregori and Miñana in [16] to the George and Veeramani context as follows.…”
Section: Contractivity and Fixed Point Theoremsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We begin recalling a notion of contractive mapping introduced by Mihet in [15]. It was adapted by Gregori and Miñana in [16] to the George and Veeramani context as follows.…”
Section: Contractivity and Fixed Point Theoremsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Proposition 2 (A. George, P. Veeramani [3]) A sequence {x n } in a fuzzy metric space (X, M, * ) converges to x 0 if and only if lim [13]) Suppose it is given a sequential stronger (weaker, respectively) concept than Cauchy sequence, say s-Cauchy sequence (w-Cauchy, respectively). A concept of convergence, say s-convergence (w-convergence, respectively), is said to be compatible with s-Cauchy (w-Cauchy, respectively), and vice-versa, if the diagram of implications below on the left (on the right, respectively) is fulfilled.…”
Section: Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, in some cases the natural concepts introduced are non-appropriate. A discussion of this assertion can be found in [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%