2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2010.09.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Steady flow-induced instability of a partially embedded pipeline: Pipe–soil interaction mechanism

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The impact of pipe roughness was investigated by Gao et al (2011). Initially a rough pipe has a smaller 1091 embedment than a similar smooth pipe, but the final maximum settlement in the breakout process is larger 1092 for the rough pipe case.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The impact of pipe roughness was investigated by Gao et al (2011). Initially a rough pipe has a smaller 1091 embedment than a similar smooth pipe, but the final maximum settlement in the breakout process is larger 1092 for the rough pipe case.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on results from their fiume tests. Gao et al [20,21] commented that the pipeline on-bottom stability under the action of combined wave and current is different from the cases of pure wave or pure current. However, the mechanism behind this difference is not the focus of this paper.…”
Section: Hydrodynamic Loadingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, they cannot effectively simulate inundation extent and depth (Sang and Yang 2017). The reasoning formula based on the theory of steady flow limit has been used in the design of drainage pipeline (Gao et al 2011). The formula cannot reflect the real physical process of rainwater drainage, particularly the processes of overflow and overload, so that it has a large calculation error.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%