2009
DOI: 10.1007/s10665-009-9324-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Steady flow of a buoyant plume into a constant-density layer

Abstract: The upward flow of a buoyant plume emanating from a horizontal fissure into a two-layered fluid region is considered. Solutions are computed numerically for a range of fissure widths and water depths. It is shown that for a given fluid depth and fissure size there is a minimum flow rate beneath which no steady solutions exist. At this limiting flow, the fluid detaches from the wall of the fissure via a stagnation point. Solutions exist for all values of flow rate above this minimum. Exact solutions are present… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
11
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
11
1
Order By: Relevance
“…(The corresponding axisymmetric flow, involving a "water bell" beneath a horizontal plate, has been investigated theoretically and confirmed in a series of elegant experiments by Button et al [5].) Similar methods to those of Christodoulides and Dias [7] were employed by Hocking and Forbes [14] in an analysis of a planar buoyant plume that rises vertically before spreading horizontally across an upper ceiling; plumes of this type occur in building fires. Their solutions were independent of time, and consequently only existed for flow speeds at the nozzle above some threshold minimum speed, and at that minimum configuration the plume interface formed a stagnation point at the nozzle itself.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 87%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…(The corresponding axisymmetric flow, involving a "water bell" beneath a horizontal plate, has been investigated theoretically and confirmed in a series of elegant experiments by Button et al [5].) Similar methods to those of Christodoulides and Dias [7] were employed by Hocking and Forbes [14] in an analysis of a planar buoyant plume that rises vertically before spreading horizontally across an upper ceiling; plumes of this type occur in building fires. Their solutions were independent of time, and consequently only existed for flow speeds at the nozzle above some threshold minimum speed, and at that minimum configuration the plume interface formed a stagnation point at the nozzle itself.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…These conditions (2.3) and (2.4) allow the solution to be developed using a spectral technique, as is discussed later. In their model of a planar plume, Hocking and Forbes [14] assumed a rigid upper boundary at z = h, and a similar condition could be considered here, too. Condition (2.4) has been adopted for simplicity, however, as it avoids the additional complication of a horizontal outflow along the upper boundary.…”
Section: The Inviscid Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To address the issue of the initiation of a plume, Russell et al [29] have recently considered the way in which, in a two-dimensional model, a line source present in the bottom of a channel creates a growing mass of lighter-density fluid that moves vertically, before forming an overturning mushroom-shaped plume and then mixing laterally in the channel. Previously, Hocking and Forbes [16] had studied the steady inviscid behaviour of a two-dimensional plume in a channel, and obtained results in which the lighter fluid, introduced through a vent at the bottom of the channel, could rise up and flow outwards along the ceiling; to some extent, the work of Russell et al [29] shows how viscosity may alter that result.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In their model of a planar plume, Hocking and Forbes [14] assumed a rigid upper boundary at z = h, and a similar condition could be considered here, too. Condition (2.4) has been adopted for simplicity, however, as it avoids the additional complication of a horizontal outflow along the upper boundary.…”
Section: The Inviscid Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%