2005
DOI: 10.1080/15421400590955569
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Steady Flow of a Nematic Liquid Crystal in a Slowly Varying Channel

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The normal stress boundary condition in these papers neglects the contribution of the elastic stress tensor, which leads to a change in sign of the elastic contribution in the free surface evolution equation. A third approach used by Carou et al [25][26][27] scales the nematic elasticity such that, to leading order, the free surface is unaffected by the elasticity, and one recovers the Newtonian thin Second, as for isotropic liquids with film thickness below about 100 nm, long-and short-range effective intermolecular forces between the substrate and the free surface have to be taken into account possibly through a Derjaguin or disjoining pressure that describes wettability effects 39 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The normal stress boundary condition in these papers neglects the contribution of the elastic stress tensor, which leads to a change in sign of the elastic contribution in the free surface evolution equation. A third approach used by Carou et al [25][26][27] scales the nematic elasticity such that, to leading order, the free surface is unaffected by the elasticity, and one recovers the Newtonian thin Second, as for isotropic liquids with film thickness below about 100 nm, long-and short-range effective intermolecular forces between the substrate and the free surface have to be taken into account possibly through a Derjaguin or disjoining pressure that describes wettability effects 39 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One can see that the nematic elasticity as well as viscosity only have influence on the mobility function Q, and thus have no influence on the stability of a free surface. This formulation has been studied extensively by Carou et al [25][26][27] both analytically and numerically under the assumption of small director variation.…”
Section: A Weak Elasticity ( = δ)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…These solutions can be viewed as the limiting profiles as the elastic constant tends to zero of the antisymmetric nematic field in the channel observed numerically in [40], cf. in particular with the approximate formula ( 29) therein, see also [41]. In the presence of active terms, some of the found passive solutions continue to exist and exhibit non-zero flow that can be spontaneously initiated from zero, for example, by increasing the film thickness, similar to the effect observed in [9,12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 56%