2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaerosci.2014.04.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Steady-state measurement of the effective particle density of cigarette smoke

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
25
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
2
25
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The dilution corrected particle number concentrations (also normalized by the total particle number concentrations measured through the CPC) in the puffs for the e-cigarette-1, 1R5F, and 3R4F samples were 4.0·10 9 , 4.8·10 9 , and 5.7·10 9 #/cm 3 , respectively. Conventional cigarettes have particle diameters ranging from 140–340 nm and number concentrations on the order of 10 9 #/cm 3 (Bernstein 2004; Adam et al 2009; Kane et al 2010; Alderman and Ingebrethsen, 2011; Johnson al. 2014).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The dilution corrected particle number concentrations (also normalized by the total particle number concentrations measured through the CPC) in the puffs for the e-cigarette-1, 1R5F, and 3R4F samples were 4.0·10 9 , 4.8·10 9 , and 5.7·10 9 #/cm 3 , respectively. Conventional cigarettes have particle diameters ranging from 140–340 nm and number concentrations on the order of 10 9 #/cm 3 (Bernstein 2004; Adam et al 2009; Kane et al 2010; Alderman and Ingebrethsen, 2011; Johnson al. 2014).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mainstream smoke particles emitted by numerous types of cigarettes have been analyzed using various techniques such as a differential mobility analyzer and a centrifugal particle mass analyzer (Johnson et al 2014), an optical aerosol spectrometer (van Dijk et al 2012), a differential mobility spectrometer (Adam et al 2009; Alderman and Ingebrethsen, 2011), and an electrical low-pressure impactor (ELPI) (Kane et al 2010). Although e-cigarette particles have been studied in the last several years, using methods such as spectral transmission and an electrical mobility analyzer (Ingebrethsen et al 2012), ELPI (Bertholon et al 2013), a scanning mobility particle sizer (SMPS) (Williams et al 2013; Zhang et al 2013), a fast mobility particle sizer (FMPS) (Schripp et al 2013; Fuoco et al 2014; Manigrasso et al 2015), and an aerosol spectrometer and ultrafine particle counter (Geiss et al 2015), online particle concentration data represent an interesting complement to VOC data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A particle density of 1.1 g cm −3 and a unit shape factor were applied for SMPS-APS distribution merging on the basis of the findings reported by Johnson et al (2014) [54].…”
Section: ∆Smentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Real-time concentrations of aerosol samples were registered in onesecond intervals. Aerodynamic diameter data obtained by ELPI+ was converted to mobility diameter using cigarette smoke density of 1180 ± 113 kg m -3 (Khlystov et al, 2004;Johnson et al, 2014).…”
Section: Indoor Air Quality Indicators and Monitorsmentioning
confidence: 99%