2010
DOI: 10.1021/ie101502d
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Steady-State Simulation and Optimization of an Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle Power Plant with CO2 Capture

Abstract: Integrated gasification combined cycle (IGCC) plants are a promising technology option for power generation with carbon dioxide (CO2) capture in view of their efficiency and environmental advantages over conventional coal utilization technologies. This paper presents a three-phase, top-down, optimization-based approach for designing an IGCC plant with precombustion CO2 capture in a process simulator environment. In the first design phase, important global design decisions are made on the basis of plant-wide op… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
139
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 100 publications
(140 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
1
139
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The simple two-stage Selexol process was simulated by Robinson and Luyben [15]. Bhattacharyya et al [16] implemented a comprehensive process simulation of an entire IGCC power plant integrated with a dual-stage Selexol process for a 90% overall carbon capture efficiency with the performance as shown in Table 5. Table 5 shows the energy consumption of the process, as extracted from Kapetaki et al [13], as well as a comparison between the energy consumption of the dual-stage Selexol process and that of the cryogenic energy-saving scheme as described earlier in Table 4.…”
Section: Performance Comparison With Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The simple two-stage Selexol process was simulated by Robinson and Luyben [15]. Bhattacharyya et al [16] implemented a comprehensive process simulation of an entire IGCC power plant integrated with a dual-stage Selexol process for a 90% overall carbon capture efficiency with the performance as shown in Table 5. Table 5 shows the energy consumption of the process, as extracted from Kapetaki et al [13], as well as a comparison between the energy consumption of the dual-stage Selexol process and that of the cryogenic energy-saving scheme as described earlier in Table 4.…”
Section: Performance Comparison With Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bhattacharyya et al developed a three-phase top-down approach to maximize the net power of an IGCC plant with CO 2 capture and to evaluate the operational flexibility of the water gas shift (WGS) reactors [52]. Those authors also carried out two optimization studies on optimal steam pressure in the waste heat boiler and H 2 S/SO 2 ratio to improve oxygen demand, hydrogen yield and power generation [53].…”
Section: Igcc: Process Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The simple two-stage Selexol process was simulated by Robinson and Luyben (2010). Bhattacharyya et al (2011) implemented a comprehensive process simulation of an entire IGCC power plant integrated with a dual-stage Selexol process for 90% overall carbon capture efficiency. Padurean et al (2012) reported an Aspen Plus simulation on a dual-stage Selexol unit at 70%, 80% and 90% CO 2 capture rate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%