Molecular Fluorescence 2012
DOI: 10.1002/9783527650002.ch9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Steady‐State Spectrofluorometry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 11 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, these correction methods often require complicated experimental setups, significant time for data collection, and do not provide notable reduction in errors. Therefore, it has been suggested that front-face measurements (such as the one shown in Figure 1b) offer significant advantages over these other techniques; the front-face measurement geometry avoids the excitation and emission paths passing through the entire sample [33], which makes correcting for IFE simpler. It has recently been shown that it is extremely difficult to completely eliminate the IFE from any measurements, and the IFE can only be minimised by use of front-face measurements on thin-film samples [29].…”
Section: The Inner Filter Effect (Ife)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these correction methods often require complicated experimental setups, significant time for data collection, and do not provide notable reduction in errors. Therefore, it has been suggested that front-face measurements (such as the one shown in Figure 1b) offer significant advantages over these other techniques; the front-face measurement geometry avoids the excitation and emission paths passing through the entire sample [33], which makes correcting for IFE simpler. It has recently been shown that it is extremely difficult to completely eliminate the IFE from any measurements, and the IFE can only be minimised by use of front-face measurements on thin-film samples [29].…”
Section: The Inner Filter Effect (Ife)mentioning
confidence: 99%