1993
DOI: 10.1016/0196-8904(93)90129-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Steam engine characteristics and theoretical performance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
8
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
1
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…show the power curves for different inlet pressures of the engine. The optimum supply pressure lies around 30 bars that has been confirmed by previous Prasad[7]. Pressures above this range will have a negative effect which is explained by a close analysis of the Molier diagram for water.…”
supporting
confidence: 70%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…show the power curves for different inlet pressures of the engine. The optimum supply pressure lies around 30 bars that has been confirmed by previous Prasad[7]. Pressures above this range will have a negative effect which is explained by a close analysis of the Molier diagram for water.…”
supporting
confidence: 70%
“…In addition, the ability to cater to fluctuating torque and velocity conditions of the reciprocating cycle makes it the preferred device for automotive applications. Nevertheless, if the energy developed in a turbine is converted into electricity and used to drive an electric motor it leads to a practical solution for hybrid vehicles [7]. An intermediate solution is the Wankel rotary expander [8].…”
Section: Rankine Cycle With a Reciprocating Expander A Reciprocatingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, this issue requires apparatuses that are not easily down scalable (eg, ORC, steam turbines) or have a very low conversion efficiency (eg, steam engines). 4 Recent developments of the Stirling engine (SE), 5 in particular in the free-piston configuration, allow to design biomass cogeneration systems even at a scale lower than 10 kW e . Although coupling a biomass burner with a Stirling engine was already attempted in the past, reliable operation has been hardly achieved.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although small biomass burners (up to 100 kW t ) have large diffusion for residential heating, cooking and small industrial applications, cogeneration of electricity along with heat in such equipment is difficult because of technological and economic barriers. In general, this issue requires apparatuses that are not easily down scalable (eg, ORC, steam turbines) or have a very low conversion efficiency (eg, steam engines) 4 . Recent developments of the Stirling engine (SE), 5 in particular in the free‐piston configuration, allow to design biomass cogeneration systems even at a scale lower than 10 kW e .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conversely, the option to use vegetable, pyrolysis, or used oils as they are in a conventional oil burner would simplify the route for producing energy in small decentralized plants. In this context and under certain conditions (ie, scale lower than 50 kW el ) SEs are optimal candidates to convert the heat generated from fuel combustion into power, 17 being more efficient as compared to other devices (eg, Rankine machines 28 or microturbine and Organic Rankine Cycle 29 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%