Structures Congress 2008 2008
DOI: 10.1061/41016(314)114
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Steel Reinforced Polymers Enhance Strength and Ductility of Beam-Column Joints under Seismic Loads

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 3 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, by focusing on the strengthening of RC beam-column joints, the literature is even more poor when compared with the information available for FRP systems. Among the few published papers, the experimental study by Izi et al (2008) is mentioned, but performed on four 1/2-scale two-dimensional exterior joints strengthened with SRPs. Although the tested specimens did not faithfully represent the existing beam-columns subassemblies due to the absence of one beam (in the case of corner joints) or two beams (in the case of façade frames) in the transverse directions, test results clearly showed the SRP effectiveness in increasing the ductility and the strength of a beam-column joint with insufficient (or no) shear reinforcement.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, by focusing on the strengthening of RC beam-column joints, the literature is even more poor when compared with the information available for FRP systems. Among the few published papers, the experimental study by Izi et al (2008) is mentioned, but performed on four 1/2-scale two-dimensional exterior joints strengthened with SRPs. Although the tested specimens did not faithfully represent the existing beam-columns subassemblies due to the absence of one beam (in the case of corner joints) or two beams (in the case of façade frames) in the transverse directions, test results clearly showed the SRP effectiveness in increasing the ductility and the strength of a beam-column joint with insufficient (or no) shear reinforcement.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%