Establishment failures are a challenge to wide‐scale use of switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.) for biomass feedstock and/or forage production. Small grain cover crops, because of their allelopathic properties, may inhibit (direct allelopathy) or enhance (competition reduction) switchgrass establishment, and provide indirect benefits such as soil conservation and forage/grain production during the establishment year. Objectives of this study were to evaluate stand density and yield based on seeding switchgrass into (i) four small grain cover crops: wheat (Triticum aestivum L.), cereal rye (Secale cereale L.), barley (Hordeum vulgare L.), oat (Avena sativa L.), and fallow control at (ii) three dates (15 March, 1 May, and 10 June) that approximated typical timing for removal of small grain cover, haylage, or grain crops in Tennessee, respectively. Treatments were assigned in a split‐plot design with three replications at three locations in Tennessee in 2008 and repeated in 2009. Small grain cover crops influenced (P = 0.002) switchgrass seedling density at only one location (wheat > other small grains > control) and interacted with year at another, but was never related (P < 0.05) to yield. Planting date affected switchgrass density and yield, but always in the context of an interaction with year; yield varied by location and year with no clear pattern. Density also varied by year and location, with fewer plants occurring during May seeding dates. Therefore, switchgrass can be planted following small grains without an apparent penalty or advantage to switchgrass stand density or yield, while offsetting lost production during establishment.