“…In general, the CO molecule exhibits a strong affinity to coordinate with transition metals. , If the interaction between CO and the active metal site is too strong, the CO desorption process will become difficult, thereby constraining the catalytic rate of the CO 2 RR, i.e., the poisoning effect. − Attention was usually paid to enhancing the stabilization of *COOH, the key intermediate of the CO pathway, for high performance; however, this correspondingly raises the adsorption energy of the *CO intermediate, leading to a higher energy barrier of *CO desorption. Thus, how to stabilize *COOH while moderately decreasing the affinity of *CO is key and challenging to improve the electrocatalytic performance of the CO 2 RR to CO. To this end, incorporating a suitable support and tuning the electronic and geometric interactions between metal atoms and the support are an effective approach to regulate the adsorption strength and binding configuration of intermediates on the catalyst surfaces. − Besides, metal atoms that have strong binding to supports could resist aggregation but may become less reactive, while weaker binding typically signifies a greater susceptibility to loss of active sites when subjected to harsh cathodic potentials. , Therefore, appropriate selection of supports and a rational understanding of the metal–support interaction are the keys to designing electrocatalysts with high catalytic performance at industrially relevant current densities for satisfying the practical application of the electrochemical CO 2 RR.…”