2011
DOI: 10.1049/iet-ifs.2010.0032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Steganalysis of compressed speech to detect covert voice over Internet protocol channels

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Table 2 showed four methods hiding messages into the three fields above. [16] f 0,1 e 0 3 LSB in active frames [17] with LSB in inactive frames [13] f 0,2 e 0 14~40% 101~40% 0~20% LSB in RTP Timestamp f 1,1 e 1 4 LSB in RTCP Jitter field [18] …”
Section: Cover Data Fields and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 2 showed four methods hiding messages into the three fields above. [16] f 0,1 e 0 3 LSB in active frames [17] with LSB in inactive frames [13] f 0,2 e 0 14~40% 101~40% 0~20% LSB in RTP Timestamp f 1,1 e 1 4 LSB in RTCP Jitter field [18] …”
Section: Cover Data Fields and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Huang et al [22] proposed a steganalysis method to detect covert VoIP communications, which used a sliding window mechanism and an improved regular singular (RS) algorithm. Huang et al [23] suggested a steganalysis method that employed the second detection and regression analysis, which not only detected the hidden message in the compressed VoIP speech, but also accurately estimated the data embedding length. However, the successfulness of VoIP steganalysis depends heavily on the steganographic algorithm used in covert VoIP communications.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To evaluate the steganalysis-resistance performance of the APMS strategies, we carry out detection tests with three existing algorithms, namely, the entropy-based algorithm [46], the poker-test algorithm [47] and the improved regular singular (RS) algorithm [48]. settings.…”
Section: Steganalysis-resistance Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%