2017
DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/aa88ae
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stellar Absorption Line Analysis of Local Star-forming Galaxies: The Relation between Stellar Mass, Metallicity, Dust Attenuation, and Star Formation Rate

Abstract: We analyze the optical continuum of star-forming galaxies in SDSS by fitting stacked spectra with stellar population synthesis models to investigate the relation between stellar mass, stellar metallicity, dust attenuation and star formation rate. We fit models calculated with star formation and chemical evolution histories that are derived empirically from multi-epoch observations of the stellar mass-star formation rate and the stellar mass-gas-phase metallicity relations, respectively. We also fit linear comb… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
24
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 103 publications
3
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Overall, we find a good correspondence between our model results and the SDSS data over the three orders of magnitude in stellar mass considered. At low masses, the slope of our model MZ * R matches that of the Zahid et al (2017) relations fairly well, although the normalisation is a factor of ∼2 above the observed mass-weighted relation. Nonetheless, it is encouraging to see convergence to a similar value of Z * at higher mass, where star-formation histories, weighting differences, and spectral fitting issues are all likely to be better constrained in observations.…”
Section: Stellar Mass-metallicity Relationsupporting
confidence: 56%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Overall, we find a good correspondence between our model results and the SDSS data over the three orders of magnitude in stellar mass considered. At low masses, the slope of our model MZ * R matches that of the Zahid et al (2017) relations fairly well, although the normalisation is a factor of ∼2 above the observed mass-weighted relation. Nonetheless, it is encouraging to see convergence to a similar value of Z * at higher mass, where star-formation histories, weighting differences, and spectral fitting issues are all likely to be better constrained in observations.…”
Section: Stellar Mass-metallicity Relationsupporting
confidence: 56%
“…Okamoto et al 2017). The data provided by Zahid et al (2017), which only consider starforming systems, are therefore likely a fairer comparison to our model relation.…”
Section: Stellar Mass-metallicity Relationmentioning
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We note that the data points from Zahid et al (2017) and Gallazzi et al (2005) in Figure 12 represent the total metallicities instead of iron abundances of galaxies in their samples. The large scatter of the MZR from Gallazzi et al Figure 11.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The top left panel of Figure 12 shows the locations of DF7, DF44, and DF17 on the MZR relative to other populations, including dwarf galaxies in the Local Group (Kirby et al 2013; gray dots), early-type galaxies stacked in stellar mass bins (Conroy et al 2014) (green), star-forming galaxies in SDSS (Zahid et al 2017), and the MZR from Gallazzi et al (2005), which covers both star-forming and quiescent SDSS galaxies (light blue). We note that the data points from Zahid et al (2017) and Gallazzi et al (2005) in Figure 12 represent the total metallicities instead of iron abundances of galaxies in their samples.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%