2018
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/sty3193
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stellar black hole binary mergers in open clusters

Abstract: In this paper we study the evolution of a primordial black hole binary (BHB) in a sample of over 1500 direct-summation N−body simulations of small-and intermediatesize isolated star clusters as proxies of galactic open clusters. The BHBs have masses in the range of the first LIGO/Virgo detections. Some of our models show a significant hardening of the BHB in a relatively short time. Some of them merge within the cluster, while ejected binaries, typically, have exceedingly long merger timescales. The perturbati… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

5
39
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 91 publications
5
39
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…2) x 10 -9 yr -1 , compatible with the value expected for TDEs triggered by BH binaries 41,42 . The 90% of disrupted stars have a mass < 0.5 M☉, thus possibly representing white dwarfs or low-mass main sequence stars.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 83%
“…2) x 10 -9 yr -1 , compatible with the value expected for TDEs triggered by BH binaries 41,42 . The 90% of disrupted stars have a mass < 0.5 M☉, thus possibly representing white dwarfs or low-mass main sequence stars.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 83%
“…One of the critical parameters affecting the natal mass of BHs is the metallicity of their progenitors, Z, as metal-poor stars are expected to produce heavier BHs (Mapelli et al 2009(Mapelli et al , 2010Belczynski et al 2010;Mapelli & Bressan 2013;Spera et al 2015) and to have a higher merger efficiency than metal-rich stars (Dominik et al 2013;Askar et al 2017;Giacobbo et al 2018). Merging BBHs form either from isolated binary stellar evolution in galactic fields (Tutukov & Yungelson 1973;Portegies Zwart & McMillan 2000;Belczynski et al 2002Belczynski et al , 2010Belczynski et al , 2016aHurley et al 2002;Mapelli & Bressan 2013;Marchant et al 2016;Giacobbo et al 2018;Arca Sedda & Benacquista 2019;Spera et al 2019, and references therein), or through dynamical interactions in dense young massive clusters (Portegies Zwart & McMillan 2000;Banerjee et al 2010;Ziosi et al 2014;Mapelli 2016;Banerjee 2017Banerjee , 2018di Carlo et al 2019a;Rastello et al 2019), globular clusters (Sigurdsson & Phinney 1993;Lee 1995;Miller & Hamilton 2002;Wen 2003;O'Leary et al 2009;Downing et al 2010;Rodriguez et al 2015;Rodriguez et al 2016;Askar et al 2017;Hong et al 2018;…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In star clusters, instead, the zoology of BBH mergers is quite vast. Dynamical scatterings can drive the shrinkage of a BBH down to a point where GWs dominate the evolution (Arca Samsing 2018;Zevin et al 2019), or can trigger the formation of triples that can efficiently affect the BBH end phase for both stable (Antonini et al 2017;Rastello et al 2019) or unstable systems (Arca .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several recent studies have examined the potential population of, in particular, dynamically-formed binaries in the LISA band. In [44][45][46], post-Newtonian (PN) direct N -body simulations were used to explore the population of LISA sources assembled dynamically in open clusters. [47] used Monte Carlo GC models (without PN corrections) to show that up to dozens of LISA sources may be found in the Milky Way GCs (including BBHs as well as other compact binaries containing neutron stars and white dwarfs).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%