2021
DOI: 10.3847/1538-4365/ac2058
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stellar Rotation in the Gaia Era: Revised Open Clusters’ Sequences

Abstract: The period versus mass diagrams (i.e., rotational sequences) of open clusters provide crucial constraints for angular momentum evolution studies. However, their memberships are often heavily contaminated by field stars, which could potentially bias the interpretations. In this paper, we use data from Gaia DR2 to reassess the memberships of seven open clusters with ground- and space-based rotational data, and present an updated view of stellar rotation as a function of mass and age. We use the Gaia astrometry t… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
22
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 171 publications
(251 reference statements)
4
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We additionally find that RUWE (wide) binaries have the same distribution in rotation as single stars at a ≈99% significance, as supported by a Kolmogorov-Smirnov test (see also Mamajek & Hillenbrand 2008;Fleming et al 2019;Godoy-Rivera et al 2021). By showing that single stars and the components of wide binaries have the same rotational distribution, Figure 13 validates the use of wide separation binaries as empirical constraints for the rotational evolution of single stars (e.g., Mamajek & Hillenbrand 2008;Janes 2017;Godoy-Rivera & Chanamé 2018;Fleming et al 2019;Otani et al 2021).…”
Section: Impact Of Binaritysupporting
confidence: 70%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We additionally find that RUWE (wide) binaries have the same distribution in rotation as single stars at a ≈99% significance, as supported by a Kolmogorov-Smirnov test (see also Mamajek & Hillenbrand 2008;Fleming et al 2019;Godoy-Rivera et al 2021). By showing that single stars and the components of wide binaries have the same rotational distribution, Figure 13 validates the use of wide separation binaries as empirical constraints for the rotational evolution of single stars (e.g., Mamajek & Hillenbrand 2008;Janes 2017;Godoy-Rivera & Chanamé 2018;Fleming et al 2019;Otani et al 2021).…”
Section: Impact Of Binaritysupporting
confidence: 70%
“…Most braking laws predict angular momentum loss that goes as dJ/dt ∝ ω 3 , where the angular momentum loss strongly depends on the rotational velocity of the star (Kawaler 1988). This has the effect of producing tight rotational sequences in intermediate-age open clusters, despite the fact that stars begin their lives with a wide range of rotation periods (e.g., Meibom et al 2011Meibom et al , 2015Barnes et al 2016;Douglas et al 2017;Rebull et al 2017;Curtis et al 2020;Fritzewski et al 2020;Godoy-Rivera et al 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We additionally find that RUWE (wide) binaries have the same distribution in rotation as single stars at a ≈ 99% significance, as supported by a Kolmogorov-Smirnov test (see also Mamajek & Hillenbrand 2008;Fleming et al 2019;Godoy-Rivera et al 2021). By showing that single stars and the components of wide binaries have the same rotational distribution, Figure 13 validates the use of wide separation binaries as empirical constraints for the rotational evolution of single stars (e.g.…”
Section: Impact Of Binaritysupporting
confidence: 72%
“…This has the effect of producing tight rotational sequences in intermediate-age open clusters, despite the fact that stars begin their lives with a wide range of rotation periods (e.g. Meibom et al 2011Meibom et al , 2015Barnes et al 2016;Douglas et al 2017;Rebull et al 2017;Curtis et al 2020;Fritzewski et al 2020;Godoy-Rivera et al 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, we note that the surface rotation periods observed for MS stars with spectral type F-G are in the range P ∼ 5-25 days (e.g. McQuillan et al 2014;Santos et al 2021;Godoy-Rivera et al 2021). Although the above cited works rely on the modulation of light-curves due to magnetic spots, that could lead to an underestimation in the number of slow rotators, it has been shown by Masuda et al (2021) that the photometric samples do not lack slow rotators.…”
Section: Sensitivity To Initial Assumptionsmentioning
confidence: 77%