2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.physrep.2020.07.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stellar structure models in modified theories of gravity: Lessons and challenges

Abstract: The understanding of stellar structure represents the crossroads of our theories of the nuclear force and the gravitational interaction under the most extreme conditions observably accessible. It provides a powerful probe of General Relativity on its strong field regime, and opens fruitful avenues for the exploration of new gravitational physics. The latter can be captured via the so-called modified theories of gravity, which modify the Einstein-Hilbert action of General Relativity and/or some of its building … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
155
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 254 publications
(172 citation statements)
references
References 485 publications
(786 reference statements)
2
155
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The most prominent one is the fact that I 1 cannot be a strong coupling; that is, it cannot differ significantly from unity in order not to violate the solar physics. It may happen, as it was discussed in, for instance, [108][109][110], that the extra terms introduced by the invariants provide a non-zero contribution to the mass function far away from the star's surface (when p(R) = 0, where R is the star's radius); that is, the mass function does not converge when r → ∞ but can oscillate instead around a constant value. This fact has following consequences: as proposed in [108] and then discussed in more detail in [111], in the case of f (R) metric gravity and general ST theories which introduce an additional degree of freedom, this phenomena could be used to test such theories against GR by the mean of the surface gravitational redshift.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most prominent one is the fact that I 1 cannot be a strong coupling; that is, it cannot differ significantly from unity in order not to violate the solar physics. It may happen, as it was discussed in, for instance, [108][109][110], that the extra terms introduced by the invariants provide a non-zero contribution to the mass function far away from the star's surface (when p(R) = 0, where R is the star's radius); that is, the mass function does not converge when r → ∞ but can oscillate instead around a constant value. This fact has following consequences: as proposed in [108] and then discussed in more detail in [111], in the case of f (R) metric gravity and general ST theories which introduce an additional degree of freedom, this phenomena could be used to test such theories against GR by the mean of the surface gravitational redshift.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Notwithstanding GR's success, the search for possible alternative theories of gravity has for many decades been a highly active area of research [1,[8][9][10][11][12], motivated by important theoretical considerations, such as the incompatibility of GR with quantum theory at a fundamental level, as well as open questions in observational astronomy and cosmology. Astronomical observations of galactic rotation curves, micro-lensing, primordial nucleosynthesis or the accelerated expansion of the universe cannot be explained in GR without evoking dark matter and dark energy, enigmatic entities beyond the standard model of particles; see, e.g., [13,14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is worth remarking that apart from MAG and PG gravity, many theories have been formulated considering an additional connection with certain properties or restrictions. See for example Ricci-Based Gravity theories containing the well-known f (R) theories [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18], or the teleparallel equivalents and their generalizations [19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From now on transversal means transversal to the congruence generated by k with respect to l 10. Applied to electromagnetic waves in Maxwell theory, this quadratic condition lead us to F∧ F = 0, namely F μν F μν = 0, that corresponds to the equality δ i j E i E j = δ i j B i B j .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%