2017
DOI: 10.1080/1081602x.2016.1265571
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stem families in rural northwestern Germany? Family systems, intergenerational relations and family contracts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, these mechanisms may be too simplistic and household composition does not always reflect power relations within the household. For example, Fertig (2018) argues that within the stem family system, parental authority could be low even in multi-generational households. Since children had alternative options to make a living and their parents were dependent on them for retirement, children had considerable bargaining power over their parents.…”
Section: Family Systems and Regional Differences In Reproductive Outcmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, these mechanisms may be too simplistic and household composition does not always reflect power relations within the household. For example, Fertig (2018) argues that within the stem family system, parental authority could be low even in multi-generational households. Since children had alternative options to make a living and their parents were dependent on them for retirement, children had considerable bargaining power over their parents.…”
Section: Family Systems and Regional Differences In Reproductive Outcmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since children had alternative options to make a living and their parents were dependent on them for retirement, children had considerable bargaining power over their parents. Historical property transfer contracts from western Germany show that parents for example gave up their property rights or the right to manage the family farm (Fertig, 2018).…”
Section: Family Systems and Regional Differences In Reproductive Outcmentioning
confidence: 99%