IntroductionSemitic word formation has proved particularly contentious over the past several years with respect to the notion of the 'root' and 'template'. While traditional grammarians viewed Semitic words as consisting of roots and patterns (involved in paradigmatic relations), this approach has proved insufficient for certain kinds of word-formation that appear to require correspondence between words, such as the relationship between singular nouns and broken plurals (Ratcliffe 1998). In modern approaches to Semitic morphology, we can recognize the following basic divisions:(1) a. Root-and-pattern morphology -a root is associated with a template; the template coordinates vowel melodies and consonant positions b. Word-based morphology -words are formed from independent words; templates act as constraints or filters on vowel/consonant combinations or as independent morphemesThe first type represents a morpheme-based theory, and within the generative autosegmental literature, received a thorough exposition in McCarthy (1979) and subsequent work. Under this approach, the template is viewed as a separate morpheme consisting of syllabic (or later moraic) positions to which a root is mapped (McCarthy 1979,