2014
DOI: 10.4244/eijv9i12a242
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stent deformation, physical stress, and drug elution obtained with provisional stenting, conventional culotte and Tryton-based culotte to treat bifurcations: a virtual simulation study

Abstract: Numerical models might successfully complement the information on stenting procedures obtained with traditional approaches such as in vitro bench testing or clinical trials. Devices dedicated to bifurcations may facilitate procedure completion and may result in specific patterns of mechanical stress, regional blood flow and drug elution.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite this observation, very few studies have adopted a sequential analysis methodology to assess both the mechanical and hemodynamic impact of stent deployment. 2,11,38,43,58,60,61,70,93 Furthermore, no study has yet employed a sequential analysis methodology to compare and contrast the performance of several different coronary stent designs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Despite this observation, very few studies have adopted a sequential analysis methodology to assess both the mechanical and hemodynamic impact of stent deployment. 2,11,38,43,58,60,61,70,93 Furthermore, no study has yet employed a sequential analysis methodology to compare and contrast the performance of several different coronary stent designs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, the mechanical impact of the stent within the artery was neglected and only a single stent design was considered. Finally, in 2014, Morlacchi et al 60 employed a sequential analysis methodology to investigate the mechanical and hemodynamic impact of both a conventional and a bifurcation stent design using different deployment strategies. To the authors' knowledge, this is the first study in which both the mechanical and hemodynamic impact of more than a single coronary stent design have been reported.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, the patterns of restenosis, defined by diameter stenosis >50 % in QCA, were quite different. The angiography-guided group showed a significantly higher incidence of restenosis in distal MV than the FFR-guided group (1.7 vs. 9.2 %, p=0.01), whereas the FFR-guided group showed significantly higher rates of restenosis in SB (21.2 [51] vs. 11.8 %, p=0.037). Taken together, previous studies suggest that FFR-guided decision-making in provisional strategy significantly lowers the incidence of SB intervention, simplifies the procedure, and reduces restenosis rates in the MV, and similar if not reduced clinical event rates compared with angiography-guided SB intervention.…”
Section: Ffr-guided Versus Angiography-guided Approach To the Jailed mentioning
confidence: 54%
“…3). The use of imaging device also enables the interventionist to confirm optimal re-wiring into MV [51,55]. By contrast, when implanting the crush technique, it is highly recommended to cross the proximal cell to avoid recrossing wire through outside of the crushed SB stent and subsequent malapposition of the strut with SB ostium after balloon dilatation of SB stent [49••, 56, 57].…”
Section: Optimizing 2-stenting Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compounding this is the inherent geometric disparity between the Y-shape of the bifurcation and the cylindrical tube of an expanded stent. 6 This can delay healing, with reduced intima formation over these sites, which may explain the higher incidence of procedural myocardial infarction (MI), stent thrombosis and restenosis that has been observed with such techniques. 7 The carina itself is subject to high shear stress and flow, and hence often free from significant atheroma.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%