2014
DOI: 10.4103/1110-1415.143555
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stented versus nonstented open pyeloplasty for primary ureteropelvic junction obstruction in children

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…That is why, renal growth or increase in cortical thickness is also used as an indicator parameter for assessing post-operative improvement and obstruction free drainage. 9,13 Another study shows the P/C ratio at preoperatively, after three months, and one year after operation. The reduction in P/C ratio was significant after three months (P<0.01) as well as at one year (P<0.01).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…That is why, renal growth or increase in cortical thickness is also used as an indicator parameter for assessing post-operative improvement and obstruction free drainage. 9,13 Another study shows the P/C ratio at preoperatively, after three months, and one year after operation. The reduction in P/C ratio was significant after three months (P<0.01) as well as at one year (P<0.01).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…UPJO may be complicated by loin pain, UTI, renal impairment, stone formation, or even hypertension. [4] In addition to the controversies regarding the surgical repair of UPJO, it remains difficult for urologist to choose optimal time for surgical intervention because the UPJO either due to intrinsic or extrinsic factors results in functional and anatomical obstruction of urine flow from the renal pelvis to ureter, which makes the natural history of the disease variable. [5] If the UPJO is left untreated in the first 6 months of life, in this period, the glomerular filtration rate increases several times, and it may result in progressive damage to the affected unit.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%