BackgroundThe use of laparoscopy for the treatment of gastric cancer suffered some
resistance among surgeons around the world, gaining strength in the past decade.
However, its oncological safety and technical feasibility remain controversial.
AimTo describe the results from the clinical and anatomopathological point of view in
the comparative evaluation between the surgical videolaparoscopic and laparotomic
treatments of total gastrectomy with linphadenectomy at D2, resection R0.MethodRetrospective analyses and comparison data from patients submitted to total
gastrectomy with D2 linphadenectomy at a sole institution. The data of 111
patients showed that 64 (57,7%) have been submitted to laparotomic gastrectomy and
47 (42,3%) to gastrectomy entirely performed through videolaparoscopy. All
variables related to the surgery, post-operative follow-up and anatomopathologic
findings have been evaluated.ResultsAmong the studied variables, videolaparoscopy has shown a shorter surgical time
and a more premature period for the introduction of oral and enteral nourishment
than the open surgery. As to the amount of dissected limph nodes, there has been a
significant difference towards laparotomy with p=0,014, but the average dissected
limph nodes in both groups exceed 25 nodes as recommended by the JAGC. Was not
found a significant difference between the studied groups as to age, ASA, type of
surgery, need for blood transfusion, stage of the disease, Bormann classification,
degree of differentiation, damage of the margins, further complications and death.
ConclusionsThe total gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy performed by laparoscopy presented
the same benefits known of laparotomy and with the advantages already established
of minimally invasive surgery. It was done with less surgical time, less time for
re-introduction of the oral and enteral diets and lower hospitalization time
compared to laparotomy, without increasing postoperative complications.