1991
DOI: 10.1002/sim.4780100614
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Step‐down multiple tests for comparing treatments with a control in unbalanced one‐way layouts

Abstract: We show how a well-known multiple step-down significance testing procedure for comparing treatments with a control in balanced one-way layouts can be applied in unbalanced layouts (unequal sample sizes for the treatments). The method we describe has the advantage that it provides p-values, for each treatment versus control comparison, that take account of the multiple step-down testing nature of the procedure. These joint p-values can be used with any value of alpha, the fixed type I family wise error rate bou… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
95
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 141 publications
(95 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
95
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To adjust for multiple comparisons, the step-down multiple testing framework for comparing treatments with a control of Dunnet and Tamhane was used. 22 For the primary efficacy measure, the two-sided significance level was 0.05. The primary efficacy end point was analysed using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) with treatment, centre, and treatment-by-centre as factors.…”
Section: Mitt Populationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To adjust for multiple comparisons, the step-down multiple testing framework for comparing treatments with a control of Dunnet and Tamhane was used. 22 For the primary efficacy measure, the two-sided significance level was 0.05. The primary efficacy end point was analysed using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) with treatment, centre, and treatment-by-centre as factors.…”
Section: Mitt Populationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Statistical analysis of results was performed by employing a factorial analysis of variance (ANOVA), or by a one-way ANOVA, followed by a Tukey-Cramer’s multiple comparison test of a Dunnett’s t test [30]. General rhythmic parameters such as acrophase (the maximum of the sinus function fit by the experimental data), mesor (the statistical estimate of the mean) and amplitude (half the difference between calculated maximal and minimal values) were calculated by Cosinor analysis.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Step-down procedures in multiple testing offer a more powerful approach than single-step procedures and come in two flavors, step-up and step-down (34,35).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%