2010
DOI: 10.1029/2009wr008635
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Step‐drawdown tests and the Forchheimer equation

Abstract: [1] Step-drawdown tests (SDTs) typically involve pumping a well at a constant rate until a quasi-steady state (QSS) is observed in the drawdown response. The well is then pumped at a higher constant rate until a new QSS is achieved. The process is repeated for additional flow rates. Analysis involves plotting the QSS drawdowns against their corresponding abstraction rates and fitting a nonlinear empirical expression. A commonly used expression, the so-called Jacob method, contains a linear "formation loss" co… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
37
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the field of reservoir engineering, fluid flow behavior near the well screen controls the efficiency of oil/gas production wells (e.g., Holditz and Morse 1976;Aulisa et al 2009), as well as the efficiency of injection/extraction wells in groundwater resources applications (e.g., Sen 1989;Mathias and Todman 2010;Wen et al 2011Wen et al , 2013Yeh and Chang 2013;Houben 2015;Mathias and Moutsopoulos 2016). Moreover, nonlinear flow at full-aquifer scale in a broad range of geological formations, such as gravel, karstic or fractured aquifers, is widely addressed in the literature (e.g., Moutsopoulos and Tsihrintzis 2005;Moutsopoulos 2007).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the field of reservoir engineering, fluid flow behavior near the well screen controls the efficiency of oil/gas production wells (e.g., Holditz and Morse 1976;Aulisa et al 2009), as well as the efficiency of injection/extraction wells in groundwater resources applications (e.g., Sen 1989;Mathias and Todman 2010;Wen et al 2011Wen et al , 2013Yeh and Chang 2013;Houben 2015;Mathias and Moutsopoulos 2016). Moreover, nonlinear flow at full-aquifer scale in a broad range of geological formations, such as gravel, karstic or fractured aquifers, is widely addressed in the literature (e.g., Moutsopoulos and Tsihrintzis 2005;Moutsopoulos 2007).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Geertsma (1974) correlation has been found to correspond to large quantities of empirical data (Mathias & Todman 2010). Multiplying the correlation by 10 represents an upper bound on likely non-Darcy effects in this porosity range.…”
Section: Numerical Solutionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the initial critical radius is zero for an initially hydrostatic aquifer, and it gradually increases with time until the system becomes quasi steady state near a constant-rate pumping well. The movement of critical radius may be more complex for the variable-rate pumping tests (Bear, 1972;Mishra et al, 2012), the slug tests (Quinn et al, 2013) or the step-drawdown tests (Louwyck et al, 2010;Mathias and Todman, 2010). Therefore, the two-region model with time-dependent critical radius is more reasonable for transient flow near a pumping well, and it is particularly true when the pumping rate changes greatly.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, Quinn et al (2013) showed that the hydraulic conductivity was underestimated by Darcy's law when the initial applied head differentials were greater than 0.2 m. They pointed out that Darcian flow conditions can be maintained in the sandstone when the initial applied head differentials were less than 0.2 m (Quinn et al, 2013). Mathias and Todman (2010) showed that the Jacob method, based on Darcy's law, cannot fit the step-drawdown tests of van Tonder et al (2001) when the pumping rate was greater than 10 m 3 h −1 . However, the Forchheimer law could fit the stepdrawdown tests data very well (Mathias and Todman, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation