“…We continue by stating the following result, which is not so easily comparable to Theorem 3 or [33] (Proposition 2.3): Proposition 3. Suppose that p ∈ [1, ∞), 1/p + 1/q = 1, there exists a finite real constant c > 0, such that ν(t) ≥ c > 0, t ∈ R, that ν : R → (0, ∞) is a Lebesgue measurable function and there exists a function ω : R → [0, ∞), such that ν(x + y) ≤ ν(x)ω(y) for all x, y ∈ R. Suppose further that f : R → X is Stepanov-(p, T, ν)-almost periodic, where ρ = T ∈ L(Y), and (R(t)) t>0 ⊆ L(X, Y) is a strongly continuous operator family satisfying the following conditions:…”