In this study, a method is proposed for MRI of the lumen of metallic vascular implants, like stents or vena cava filters. The method is based on the reduction of artifacts caused by flow, susceptibility, and RF eddy currents. Whereas both flow artifacts and susceptibility artifacts are well understood and documented, RF artifacts are not. Therefore, the present study comprises an in-depth theoretical explanation of the factors governing the severity of these RF artifacts. It is explained that the RF caging inside cage-like implants is caused by disturbances of the send and receive sensitivities due to coupling between the loops in the implant and the MR scanner's send and receive coils. A scaled excitation angle model describing the behavior of the signal intensity inside the implants as a function of the applied nominal excitation angle is introduced. This theoretical model was validated in phantom experiments. Reduced signal from within implants due to the caging problem could be restored by increasing the applied RF power in the excitation pulse, without exceeding the generally accepted SAR safety limits. For all these applications the imaging of regions of the body containing metallic vascular implants, like stents and vena cava filters, is troublesome because of the artifacts provoked by these implants. In particular, MRA of stented vessels is hampered inside and near the stent. Often signal void is seen at these locations, rendering evaluation of the stent lumen and detection of possible restenosis inside the stent impossible (9 -11).Several authors have studied the artifacts caused by various commonly used stents in . The application of contrast enhanced (CE) MRA techniques has been shown to provide some improvement in stent visualization, but still it was found that the extent to which the images are distorted depends strongly on the type of stent used. For older stent types, often made from stainless steel alloys, the artifacts are mainly due to local differences in magnetic volume susceptibility between the stent and its surroundings. For this reason, stents made of ferromagnetic materials show larger susceptibility artifacts than stents made of so-called MR-compatible materials like tantalum or nitinol. Recently however, it was observed that stents made from the same material, thereby having the same magnetic susceptibility, can provoke significantly different degrees of signal loss in their lumen (17,21,22). These differences were attributed to small variations in susceptibility (16) and to differences in the design of the wire mesh. RF caging of the stent lumen by the metallic cage-like construction of the implant plays an important role here. The extent to which this caging takes place is obviously different for different cage constructions, which accounts for the observed differences in signal disturbance inside the stents.Whereas both flow artifacts and susceptibility artifacts are well understood and documented, RF artifacts are not. Therefore, an in-depth study of the factors governing the seve...