2017
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.m116.746826
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Steps for Shigella Gatekeeper Protein MxiC Function in Hierarchical Type III Secretion Regulation

Abstract: Type III secretion systems are complex nanomachines used for injection of proteins from Gram-negative bacteria into eukaryotic cells. Although they are assembled when the environmental conditions are appropriate, they only start secreting upon contact with a host cell. Secretion is hierarchical. First, the pore-forming translocators are released. Second, effector proteins are injected. Hierarchy between these protein classes is mediated by a conserved gatekeeper protein, MxiC, in Shigella. As its molecular mec… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
22
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
2
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, mutation in MxiC that abolishes MxiI interaction (MxiC F206S ) leads to a mxiC ‐mutant phenotype in terms of early effectors secretion (Cherradi et al., ). Nevertheless, this mutation still allows CR response as a wild‐type strain suggesting that the two functions of MxiC can be uncoupled, as confirmed recently (Roehrich et al., ). To strengthen our model, we have looked for a point mutation in MxiI that, by losing MxiC binding capacities, will also lead to the loss of effectors secretion control ( mxiC ‐like phenotype).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 61%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Indeed, mutation in MxiC that abolishes MxiI interaction (MxiC F206S ) leads to a mxiC ‐mutant phenotype in terms of early effectors secretion (Cherradi et al., ). Nevertheless, this mutation still allows CR response as a wild‐type strain suggesting that the two functions of MxiC can be uncoupled, as confirmed recently (Roehrich et al., ). To strengthen our model, we have looked for a point mutation in MxiI that, by losing MxiC binding capacities, will also lead to the loss of effectors secretion control ( mxiC ‐like phenotype).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…Eluted fractions (EF) were resolved by SDS-PAGE and analyzed by Coomassie blue staining and by Western blot using monoclonal antibodies against His-tag. All experiments were performed at least three times strain suggesting that the two functions of MxiC can be uncoupled, as confirmed recently (Roehrich et al, 2016). To strengthen our model, we have looked for a point mutation in MxiI that, by losing MxiC binding capacities, will also lead to the loss of effectors secretion control (mxiC-like phenotype).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…SepL and homologous gatekeepers (e.g., MxiC, CopN, YopN/TyeA) are considered as exported, effector-like proteins with N-terminal signal peptides (Fields & Hackstadt, 2000;Botteaux et al, 2009;Younis et al, 2010;Amer et al, 2016). However, if and how their own export relates to that of translocators or effectors is unclear (Roehrich et al, 2017). Gatekeepers might recognize specific sequences that lie downstream of the N-terminal signal sequences of translocators, for example, in EspB (Deng et al, 2015;Roehrich et al, 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, if and how their own export relates to that of translocators or effectors is unclear (Roehrich et al, 2017). Gatekeepers might recognize specific sequences that lie downstream of the N-terminal signal sequences of translocators, for example, in EspB (Deng et al, 2015;Roehrich et al, 2017). We anticipate that the novel receptor role revealed here and analyzed in detail for CesAB might be universal for translocator chaperones, even those structurally distinct from CesAB [e.g., the CesD and CesD2 class III chaperones of EspB and D (Wainwright & Kaper, 1998;Neves et al, 2003)].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…S. flexneri 5a M90T, along with S. flexneri 2a, is one of the most commonly employed laboratory reference strain for S. flexneri in many independent research groups across the globe [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27]. Indeed, much of our knowledge of the molecular mechanisms of Shigella pathogenesis has been obtained using S. flexneri M90T as a model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%