Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
From My 1992, Petroleum Development Oman (PDO) embarked on a series of field trials to assess the operational feasibility and commercial benefits of Underbalanced Drilling (UBD) for improving the company's oil production. The target formations were depleted sandstone reservoirs and fractured carbonate reservoirs, known for deferred oil production due to flushing by lost circulation. After four foam drilling trials in depleted reservoirs, it was concluded that, although a production increase was identified, a clear commercial quantification of UBD benefits was still lacking. A larger campaign in a single field with considerable offset production data was therefore desirable to establish the production improvement as a result of reduced impairment. Furthermore, UBD had to be extended to Underbalanced Operations (UBO) which includes logging and completing, without killing the well at any point to reap the full benefits. The scope for UBO had to be increased to include free flowing wells. The Nimr field (in South Oman) was identified as a suitable area where many offset wells are available (some 100 wells drilled to date) and where a large application of UBO is envisaged, once it has proven to be commercially attractive. The Nimr field contains viscous (400 cP) oil with traces of H2S in sandstone reservoir at a depth of 950 m with a pressure of 810.4 kPa/m. The wells are completed with a horizontal 7" predrilled liner and 4 1/2" wire wrapped screens over the reservoir. Technical solutions are presented to drill, evaluate and complete these wells without the need to kill. Health, Safety and Environment (HSE) issues of UBO have been addressed and where necessary appropriate measures have been taken to maintain the same level of HSE standards as applicable for conventional overbalanced operations. The criteria and the means to determine the economic merits of UBO were established before embarking on a campaign in the Nimr field. A maximum incremental well cost for the campaign has been set on the basis of the possible productivity increase. A possible increase in rate of penetration (ROP) during the campaign would be an added benefit, but is not considered the main driver behind the project. Horizontal wells in the Nimr field show a significant spread in inflow performance and a statistical approach was applied to determine the number of wells needed to prove with confidence that the break-even productivity increase has been achieved. Pre-campiagn trials for Coiled Tubing logging and shale stability have been conducted. Results of the shale stability trial have led to the decision to discontinue the Nimr UBO campaign because it caused the project to become uneconomical. However, PDO will continue to look for areas where UBO may offer economic opportunities, following the same approach as outlined for the Nimr field! Based on PDO's past experience and the recent developments in coiled tubing operations, it is envisaged that in 1996 a merger will take place between these two key technologies to allow for a technically integrated and commercially more attractive approach to underbalanced operations.
From My 1992, Petroleum Development Oman (PDO) embarked on a series of field trials to assess the operational feasibility and commercial benefits of Underbalanced Drilling (UBD) for improving the company's oil production. The target formations were depleted sandstone reservoirs and fractured carbonate reservoirs, known for deferred oil production due to flushing by lost circulation. After four foam drilling trials in depleted reservoirs, it was concluded that, although a production increase was identified, a clear commercial quantification of UBD benefits was still lacking. A larger campaign in a single field with considerable offset production data was therefore desirable to establish the production improvement as a result of reduced impairment. Furthermore, UBD had to be extended to Underbalanced Operations (UBO) which includes logging and completing, without killing the well at any point to reap the full benefits. The scope for UBO had to be increased to include free flowing wells. The Nimr field (in South Oman) was identified as a suitable area where many offset wells are available (some 100 wells drilled to date) and where a large application of UBO is envisaged, once it has proven to be commercially attractive. The Nimr field contains viscous (400 cP) oil with traces of H2S in sandstone reservoir at a depth of 950 m with a pressure of 810.4 kPa/m. The wells are completed with a horizontal 7" predrilled liner and 4 1/2" wire wrapped screens over the reservoir. Technical solutions are presented to drill, evaluate and complete these wells without the need to kill. Health, Safety and Environment (HSE) issues of UBO have been addressed and where necessary appropriate measures have been taken to maintain the same level of HSE standards as applicable for conventional overbalanced operations. The criteria and the means to determine the economic merits of UBO were established before embarking on a campaign in the Nimr field. A maximum incremental well cost for the campaign has been set on the basis of the possible productivity increase. A possible increase in rate of penetration (ROP) during the campaign would be an added benefit, but is not considered the main driver behind the project. Horizontal wells in the Nimr field show a significant spread in inflow performance and a statistical approach was applied to determine the number of wells needed to prove with confidence that the break-even productivity increase has been achieved. Pre-campiagn trials for Coiled Tubing logging and shale stability have been conducted. Results of the shale stability trial have led to the decision to discontinue the Nimr UBO campaign because it caused the project to become uneconomical. However, PDO will continue to look for areas where UBO may offer economic opportunities, following the same approach as outlined for the Nimr field! Based on PDO's past experience and the recent developments in coiled tubing operations, it is envisaged that in 1996 a merger will take place between these two key technologies to allow for a technically integrated and commercially more attractive approach to underbalanced operations.
Summary This paper describes the use of two computer simulation utilities to design underbalanced or near-balanced coiled tubing drilling: one is a steady-state design module and the other is a transient wellbore simulator developed for coiled-tubing operations. The steady-state design module provides various design parameters for a drilling operation, and the transient wellbore simulator predicts the outcome from a particular design for the entire operation. Simulation results show the desired under or near balance can only be achieved by certain combinations of liquid and gas rates when using foam as the drilling fluid or using gas injection through gas-lift mandrel or parasite string. The effects of cuttings loading, depth of injection point and reservoir inflow on the downhole pressure or underbalance are presented and discussed. A procedure for designing under- or near-balanced drilling is described and demonstrated with an example using the computer utilities. A field example is used to show the accuracy of the simulator by comparing the measured and simulated downhole pressures. Introduction It has long been recognized that a key to improving the recovery of reserves is to minimize the reservoir damage created while drilling. Thus, the main objective of drilling close to or under balance is to increase the productivity of the well by reducing formation damage due to the invasion of the formation by the drilling fluid and/or fines. Additional advantages of underbalanced drilling are that higher penetration rates are obtained than with overbalanced drilling, the risk of differential sticking is reduced, and hole cleaning is improved. Coiled tubing is particularly suitable for underbalanced or near-balanced drilling because of the improved well control in a coiled-tubing system and because coiled tubing allows continuous drilling while maintaining the underbalance.1–4 When planning an underbalanced drilling operation, the magnitude of the desired underbalance is a primary consideration. If the downhole pressure is too low, there may be wellbore stability problems. The amount of underbalance also determines the rate of fluid production from the reservoir and the surface facility should be able to handle the production fluid in the return flow. After the desired amount of underbalance is determined, the next step is to determine how to achieve this underbalance. For normal or high pressure reservoirs, underbalance can be achieved by using water, brine or diesel as the drilling fluid. For low pressure reservoirs, nitrogen or produced gas is used to aerate the drilling fluid and reduce downhole pressure. Two injection methods are often used. One is pumping foam or nitrified fluid down the coiled tubing and into the annulus, and the other is injecting nitrogen or produced gas through a parasite string or through existing gas lift mandrels to aerate the liquid column in the annulus. The advantages and disadvantages of using foam and gas injection are discussed in Refs. 5 and 6. Aerated or foam drilling fluids are compressible. Downhole pressure or the amount of underbalance while circulating is more difficult to calculate for compressible fluids, and computer simulation tools therefore become necessary when designing under- or near-balanced drilling using compressible fluids.7–9 This paper is concerned with how to achieve the desired under or near balance when using foam or gas injection. Downhole pressure behaviors for various drilling conditions are studied using two computer simulation utilities. A design procedure is presented and demonstrated with a simulation example. Computer Simulation Overview When designing an under or near balanced drilling operation, questions like those listed below often need to be answered:What are the gas and liquid pump rates for achieving the desired under or near balance?What are the gas and liquid pump rates for achieving efficient hole cleaning?How much reservoir fluid will be produced in an underbalanced condition?How does the produced fluid and cuttings loading affect the downhole pressure?What is the maximum rate we can pump without exceeding the pressure limit of the coiled tubing or other well equipment? Two PC based computer utilities have been developed to assist the design of coiled tubing operations. One is a steady-state design aids module (DAM) and the other is a transient wellbore simulator.10,11 They are well suited for answering these questions when designing under and near-balanced coiled-tubing drilling operations. The DAM calculates the coiled-tubing circulation pressure, downhole pressure, foam quality, flow rate and solids concentration for given wellbore and coiled-tubing conditions. It provides liquid and gas rates for achieving the desired downhole pressure based on simplified steady-state conditions. The results are presented in the form of sensitivity plots and show the trend of change of the parameters, which is particularly useful when there is uncertainty in the design conditions. A pump schedule, as well as coiled-tubing size, fluid types, and injection method, can be determined based on the simulation results from the DAM. The operation design can then be tested using the wellbore simulator. The wellbore simulator predicts the transient results of pressure, velocity, cuttings removal, and foam quality in an operation when a designed pump schedule is executed. It includes the effect of the coiled-tubing movement, cuttings transport, inflow or fluid loss due to the reservoir, and change in pumping conditions during the operation. Based on the transient results, all requirements and limits can be verified for the entire operation.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.