Abstract:The energy from biomass can be utilized through the thermochemical conversion processes of pyrolysis and gasification. Biomass such as wood chips is heated in a gasification reactor to produce a synthesis gas containing CO, H 2 and CH 4 . The gas can be further processed to bioproducts or fuels. The thermochemical process involves devolatilization of wood followed by steam gasification, CO 2 gasification, methanation, water gas shift reactions and methane reforming. To optimize the performance of the reactor, … Show more
“…The complexity and dimensions of the model are also increased with the desired model outputs, that is, with more detailed reaction kinetics and reactor hydrodynamics. However, because it has been frequently reported that the complex solid-fluid contact patterns of fluidized bed gasifiers may result in larger deviations from ideal equilibrium compositions (and ideal mixing), kinetic-hydrodynamic modelling is a particularly common approach chosen for modelling fluidized bed gasifiers, as argued by several authors [25,28,37,38,42,51,54,56,64]. The promise of potentially more accurate results motivates about 34% of the researchers who model gasification to employ simulations that model the kinetics of key reactions (see Fig.…”
Currently around 10% of all energy generated worldwide comes from biomass. Most of this 10% is biofuel energy from the fermentation of corn and sugarcane. Fermentation of corn competes with the global food supply, and fermentation of sugarcane drives deforestation. Therefore, the renewable and sustainable growth of these two bio-based energy sources may not be desirable even if it is economically feasible. Biomass gasification by contrast is significantly more flexible in terms of the bio-feedstock or waste that can be processed to either produce biofuels or to co-generate electricity and heat on demand. This superior flexibility of gasification both in terms of the feedstock type and also the energy generation or fuel production options, is what drives expanding research and implementation opportunities for biomass gasification. Research progress is accelerated by modelling work. This review is the first review in the biomass gasification modelling field to collect and analyze statistics on the growing number of gasification modelling studies and approaches used. The frequency of the various modelling choices made, and the trends this data reveals, is reported. For new researchers this review provides a succinct guide to the modelling choices that needs to made early on in a modelling study or project. A detailed methodology characterization is introduced that includes consequential modelling choices not explicitly addressed by prior reviews. To seasoned researchers this study provides the first statistical (as opposed to ad hoc or anecdotal) picture of what their fellow researchers are doing. The data to be presented reveals that even though the availability of kinetic data increased over the last two decades, the fraction of simulations that utilize kinetic modelling (as opposed to pure equilibrium calculations) decreased from roughly 50% to around 25% over the last decade.
“…The complexity and dimensions of the model are also increased with the desired model outputs, that is, with more detailed reaction kinetics and reactor hydrodynamics. However, because it has been frequently reported that the complex solid-fluid contact patterns of fluidized bed gasifiers may result in larger deviations from ideal equilibrium compositions (and ideal mixing), kinetic-hydrodynamic modelling is a particularly common approach chosen for modelling fluidized bed gasifiers, as argued by several authors [25,28,37,38,42,51,54,56,64]. The promise of potentially more accurate results motivates about 34% of the researchers who model gasification to employ simulations that model the kinetics of key reactions (see Fig.…”
Currently around 10% of all energy generated worldwide comes from biomass. Most of this 10% is biofuel energy from the fermentation of corn and sugarcane. Fermentation of corn competes with the global food supply, and fermentation of sugarcane drives deforestation. Therefore, the renewable and sustainable growth of these two bio-based energy sources may not be desirable even if it is economically feasible. Biomass gasification by contrast is significantly more flexible in terms of the bio-feedstock or waste that can be processed to either produce biofuels or to co-generate electricity and heat on demand. This superior flexibility of gasification both in terms of the feedstock type and also the energy generation or fuel production options, is what drives expanding research and implementation opportunities for biomass gasification. Research progress is accelerated by modelling work. This review is the first review in the biomass gasification modelling field to collect and analyze statistics on the growing number of gasification modelling studies and approaches used. The frequency of the various modelling choices made, and the trends this data reveals, is reported. For new researchers this review provides a succinct guide to the modelling choices that needs to made early on in a modelling study or project. A detailed methodology characterization is introduced that includes consequential modelling choices not explicitly addressed by prior reviews. To seasoned researchers this study provides the first statistical (as opposed to ad hoc or anecdotal) picture of what their fellow researchers are doing. The data to be presented reveals that even though the availability of kinetic data increased over the last two decades, the fraction of simulations that utilize kinetic modelling (as opposed to pure equilibrium calculations) decreased from roughly 50% to around 25% over the last decade.
“…After pyrolysis, RGibbs is applied for simulation of the biomass gasification. This reactor computes the syngas composition by minimizing the Gibbs free energy based on complete chemical equilibrium assumption [57][58][59][60][61]. Input streams to the RGibbs are decomposed biomass and air then combustion and reduction reactions will be occurred inside of the reactor.…”
Section: Figure 1 Modules and Streams Of Gasification Simulated In Aspen Plusmentioning
An equilibrium simulation model was developed by applying Aspen Plus to evaluate the performance of 28 wood and woody biomass (W&WB) gasification in a downdraft gasifier integrated with power production unit. The developed simulation model does not focus the gasification process as a closed box, it considers important processes in gasification like drying, pyrolysis, combustion, gasification and integrated with power production plant (combustion chamber plus gas turbine). The results for the 28 W&WB alternatives show that the net power produced from 1-ton feedstock entering to the gasification system is between the interval [0-400 kW/ton] and among them, gasification system derived from Tamarack bark biomass significantly outranks all other systems by producing 363 kW/ton, owing to the favorable results obtained in the performance analysis. Moreover, effect of various operating parameters such as gasification temperature and air to fuel ratio (AFR) on the system performance was carried out. Finally, the developed model is applied as an effective tool to assess the impact of so many biomasses and operating parameters on output power.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.