2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.fob.2015.06.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stepwise error‐prone PCR and DNA shuffling changed the pH activity range and product specificity of the cyclodextrin glucanotransferase from an alkaliphilicBacillus sp

Abstract: Graphical abstract

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this technique, random fragmentation of genes in a library (e.g., by DNase I digestion) is followed by PCR-based reassembly of overlapping fragments with sufficient homology, which effectively recombines mutations within the gene library [ 71 ]. Examples of DNA shuffling in combination with epPCR are seen in protein engineering efforts that have introduced mutations to the CBM of cyclodextrin glucanotransferase from Bacillus sp., and the glycan-binding regions of N -oligosaccharyltransferase from Campylobacter jejuni resulting in increased specificity and efficiency of those enzymes [ 72 , 73 ].…”
Section: Mutagenesis Methods For Library Generationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this technique, random fragmentation of genes in a library (e.g., by DNase I digestion) is followed by PCR-based reassembly of overlapping fragments with sufficient homology, which effectively recombines mutations within the gene library [ 71 ]. Examples of DNA shuffling in combination with epPCR are seen in protein engineering efforts that have introduced mutations to the CBM of cyclodextrin glucanotransferase from Bacillus sp., and the glycan-binding regions of N -oligosaccharyltransferase from Campylobacter jejuni resulting in increased specificity and efficiency of those enzymes [ 72 , 73 ].…”
Section: Mutagenesis Methods For Library Generationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Synthesis reactions were performed in 1 mL total volume at 50 °C (GeoT at 60 °C), and 100 μL of aliquots was removed after 1, 4, 8, 16, and 24 h (with GeoT also after 48 and 72 h) and added to 100 μL 0.2 m acetic acid buffer, pH 4.5, followed by heat inactivation and glucoamylase treatment as previously described . Samples were diluted and analyzed by high‐pressure anion exchange chromatography with pulsed amperometric detection (HPAEC‐PAD) as described previously . Elution was performed at −10 to 2 min with 8 m m NaNO 3 , followed by linear gradients to 14, 22, 36, 80, 200, 100, and 8 m m NaNO 3 at 10, 35, 45, 55 57, 58, and 62 min after injection.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Protein sequences from 30 CGTases were obtained from the National Center of Biotechnology Information (www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov; accession numbers in Table S1) and compared to the CGTase G825-6 sequence [43] using a clustalW algorithm implemented in the homology software MEGA, version 6.06 [44]. Based on the X-ray structure of the CGTase from Bacillus clarkii (PDB:4JCM), obtained from the Protein Data Bank (PDB) (www.rcsb.org), structure homology modeling was performed using the SWISS-MODEL platform [45,46].…”
Section: Protein Sequence Alignments and Molecular Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%