Stepwise Formal Modeling and Verification of Self-Adaptive Systems with Event-B. The Automatic Rover Protection Case Study

Singh, Neeraj Kumar; Aït‐Ameur, Yamine; Pantel, Marc; Dieumegard, Arnaud; Jenn, Éric

doi:10.1109/iceccs.2016.015

Cited by 9 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 24 publications

(26 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The Event-B method has been used successfully to design critical systems for a variety of applications, including the control system for the Meteor line 14 in Paris and the VAL shuttle for Paris CDG airport [21,22,23], as well as medical devices [24,25,26], autonomous systems [27,28], security protocols [29,30], control-command systems [31,32,33], and distributed protocols [34,35,36,37,38]. More information can be found in [39].…”

Section: Applicationsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Formal verification and code generation for solidity smart contracts

Singh¹,

Fajge²,

Halder³

et al. 2023

Distributed Computing to Blockchain

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Applicationsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Formal verification and code generation for solidity smart contracts

Singh¹,

Fajge²,

Halder³

et al. 2023

Distributed Computing to Blockchain

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Application of the B method. Event-B method has been successfully applied to design critical systems for applications, like control system for the Meteor line 14 in Paris or the VAL shuttle for Paris CDG airport [9], medical devices [40], autonomous systems [42], security protocols [10], control-command systems [23] and distributed protocols [34,48]. More information can be found in [17,39].…”

Section: Event-b Extensions With Theoriesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Leveraging Event-B Theories for Handling Domain Knowledge in Design Models

Mendil¹,

Aït‐Ameur²,

Singh³

et al. 2021

Dependable Software Engineering. Theories, Tools, and Applications

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Formal system modelling languages lack explicit constructs to model domain knowledge, hindering clear separation of this knowledge from system design models. Indeed, in many cases, this knowledge is hardcoded in the system formal specification or is simply overlooked. Providing explicit domain knowledge constructs and properties would yield a significant improvement in the robustness and confidence of the system design models. Therefore, it speeds up formal verification of safety properties and advances system certification since certification standards and requirements rely on domain knowledge models. The purpose of this paper is to show how formal system design models can benefit from explicit handling of domain knowledge, represented as ontologies. To this end, state-based Event-B modelling language and theories are used to model system models and domain knowledge ontologies, respectively. Our proposition is exemplified by the TCAS (Traffic Collision Avoidance System) system, a critical airborne avionic component. Finally, we provide an assessment highlighting the overall approach.

show abstract

“…Hence the implementation of the correct-by-construction paradigm. Applications of this method can be found for example in [52], [53]. As shown on Figure 11, this approach could rather be seen as an alternative to the first phases of the classical design flow, to build a correct-by-construction view of the SoC platform, from an abstract system specification.…”

Section: Comparison With the Correct-by-construction Approachmentioning

confidence: 99%