2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2008.10.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stereo analysis of high-resolution SAR images for building height estimation in cases of orthogonal aspect directions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In remote sensing, height information in urban areas is derived from stereoscopic aerial images [4]- [6], satellitebased stereo images [6]- [9], or spaceborne SAR data [10], [11]. Furthermore, light detection and ranging (LiDAR) represents a traditional data set, used to derive building models [12]- [16].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In remote sensing, height information in urban areas is derived from stereoscopic aerial images [4]- [6], satellitebased stereo images [6]- [9], or spaceborne SAR data [10], [11]. Furthermore, light detection and ranging (LiDAR) represents a traditional data set, used to derive building models [12]- [16].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A discrete dynamic processing is then used for matching the bright crosses. (Soergel et al, 2009) detects silent lines and points in orthogonal-side images before merging them within a production system. Finally, (Goel et al, 2012), makes use of Bayesian inference for estimating the absolute height of single point scatterers, using at least three same-side images taken under different angles.…”
Section: State-of-the-artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the several matching methods presented in the literature, one can distinguish between intensity-based (Leberl et al 1994) and feature based (Simonetto et al 2005;Soergel et al 2009) approaches. Here, we tested an intensity-based matching method using maximal normalised cross correlation, often considered to be one of the most accurate matching method.…”
Section: Experimental Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%