2018
DOI: 10.3390/s18113706
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stereo Camera Head-Eye Calibration Based on Minimum Variance Approach Using Surface Normal Vectors

Abstract: This paper presents a stereo camera-based head-eye calibration method that aims to find the globally optimal transformation between a robot’s head and its eye. This method is highly intuitive and simple, so it can be used in a vision system for humanoid robots without any complex procedures. To achieve this, we introduce an extended minimum variance approach for head-eye calibration using surface normal vectors instead of 3D point sets. The presented method considers both positional and orientational error var… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These uncertainties could originate from either robot TCP pose errors or camera pose errors. Many studies [19,22,31] suggest testing the robustness of the methods by inducing one type of noise at a time into the system and evaluating its performance based on the response. Unfortunately, these uncertainties are mostly co-existent and co-dependent in real-world cases.…”
Section: Performance Evaluation Using Datasetsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These uncertainties could originate from either robot TCP pose errors or camera pose errors. Many studies [19,22,31] suggest testing the robustness of the methods by inducing one type of noise at a time into the system and evaluating its performance based on the response. Unfortunately, these uncertainties are mostly co-existent and co-dependent in real-world cases.…”
Section: Performance Evaluation Using Datasetsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These uncertainties could originate from either robot TCP pose errors or camera pose errors. Many studies [19,21,30] suggest testing the robustness of the methods by inducing one type of noise at a time into the system and evaluating its performance based on the response. Unfortunately, these uncertainties are mostly co-existent and co-dependent in real-world cases.…”
Section: Pseudo-real Noise Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, we achieve the cooperation signs' coordinate in the target's coordinate system, and then, we solve the pose from the target to the camera's coordinate system. [17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26] Horn et al 20 utilized the point cloud of the side surface, which achieved by a laser profile sensor to measure the pose of cylindrical components, but this method cannot work at high frequencies. Some researchers estimated camera's pose by the correspondence of lines or epipolar constraint.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some researchers estimated camera's pose by the correspondence of lines or epipolar constraint. [21][22][23][24][25] Zhou et al 26 proposed a method to track and estimate the pose of known rigid objects efficiently in a complex environment, which based on a 3D particle filter with M-estimation optimization. The fourth method is to directly achieve the point cloud by a laser profile sensor and then use the point cloud to estimate the target's attitude.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%