Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing this collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden to Department of Defense, Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information
PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NUMBERUniversity of Pittsburgh Pittsburgh, PA, 15260
SPONSORING / MONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 10. SPONSOR/MONITOR'S ACRONYM(S)
U.S. Army Medical Research and Materiel Command Fort Detrick, Maryland 21702-5012
SPONSOR/MONITOR'S REPORT NUMBER(S)
DISTRIBUTION / AVAILABILITY STATEMENTApproved for Public Release; Distribution Unlimited
SUPPLEMENTARY NOTESOriginal contains colored plates: ALL DTIC reproductions will be in black and white.
ABSTRACTThe main purpose of this project is to investigate the feasibility and efficacy of using a stereo display workstation for lung cancer screening on CT images. The tasks included in this project are development and evaluation of stereo image projection and display for chest CT images, observer performance evaluation for the stereo display, and stereo feature analysis and comparison to the conventionally used display methods for lung cancer detection. In the previous report period, we have built a stereo display workstation for chest CT images and conducted a pilot observer performance study. In this annual report period, we have continued the study based on the projected tasks as listed below. 1. Analyzing the results from the pilot study: we applied Free-response Receiver Operating Characteristic (FROC) statistic method to analyze the data from the pilot study for lung nodule detection and classification. Results indicate that the stereo display achieved the best performance followed by the slice-by-slice display, and the conventional MIP display gave the worst performance, although there is no statistically significant difference between the three display modes. Subjective assessment indicates that the stereo display was well accepted by the radiologists. Efficiency measurement indicates that the radiologists spent the least interpretation time with the stereo display when compared to the other two display modes. Further analysis of the radiologists' interpretation patterns indicates that novelty and training effect substantially influenced the radiologists' interpretation behavior and performance. The conclusion from the preliminary results is that we have observed a potential role of stereo display for improving radiologists' performance in medical detection and diagnosis, and also observed some factors likely affecting the performance with new display, such as novelty, training effect and confidence with the new technology, including the stereo display. Appropria...