“…Compared to the literature molecules, the second dithiocarbamate and hmta ligands are pushed away from the symmetric dithiocarbamate ligand, again due to the close approach of a symmetry related hmta molecule to enable the C-H By contrast to xanthate and dithiocarbamate ligands, equivalent canonical structures to those shown in Figure 10 do not exist for the dithiophosphate, − [S 2 P(OR) 2 ], and dithiophosphinateand, − S 2 PR 2 , ligands owing to the tetrahedral geometry of the phosphorus atom. Accordingly, these ligands are less likely to be chelating and show a greater propensity for bridging metal centres [7,8,47,48], often via secondary interactions [49,50], and therefore, to form coordination polymers with polyfunctional Lewis base donors [51,52]. In this context, all of the known metal dithiophosphates/dithiophosphinates adducts of hmta bar one, have the latter coordinating in a bidentate, bridging mode [53][54][55].…”