2011
DOI: 10.1029/2011gl048599
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stereochemical transfer to atmospheric aerosol particles accompanying the oxidation of biogenic volatile organic compounds

Abstract: Asymmetric emission profiles of the stereoisomers of plant‐derived volatile organic compounds vary with season, geography, plant type, and stress factors. After oxidation of these compounds in the atmosphere, the low‐vapor pressure products ultimately contribute strongly to the particle‐phase material of the atmosphere. In order to explore the possibility of stereochemical transfer to atmospheric aerosol particles during the oxidation of biogenic volatile organic compounds, second‐order coherent vibrational sp… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Comparable filter loadings (upper limits of 20 μg vs 285 μg) and similar particle sizes (about 93 nm) were used for the present flow tube and 2011 chamber studies. 31,48 Control studies carried out as part of this present work show that a filter containing α-pinene-derived SOM from the flow tube produced higher SFG signal intensity than SOM transferred from the same Teflon filter onto a fused silica window when probed in external reflection geometry (see Supporting Information). The weak SFG signal in the latter case may be due to the small quantity of material transferred from the Teflon filter onto the fused silica window.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Comparable filter loadings (upper limits of 20 μg vs 285 μg) and similar particle sizes (about 93 nm) were used for the present flow tube and 2011 chamber studies. 31,48 Control studies carried out as part of this present work show that a filter containing α-pinene-derived SOM from the flow tube produced higher SFG signal intensity than SOM transferred from the same Teflon filter onto a fused silica window when probed in external reflection geometry (see Supporting Information). The weak SFG signal in the latter case may be due to the small quantity of material transferred from the Teflon filter onto the fused silica window.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Control experiments using a HEPA filter to remove the SOA particles from the chamber outflow while sending the vapor phase over collection filters resulted in no appreciable SFG signal from the collection filter. 48 We conclude that the high volatility of the SOA gas phase species prevents them from binding irreversibly to the Teflon filter.…”
Section: Limit Of Detection Analysis and Condensational Versus Coagulmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The synthetic epoxide and tetraol samples were analyzed at room temperature by SFG by contacting a fused silica window with (a) their equilibrium vapor pressure (Lide, 1997) and (b) their condensed phase following spin coating of the sample dissolved in deuterated methanol. Synthetic SOA particle material, condensed over the course of several days onto 50 nm-sized ammonium sulfate seed particles during the reaction of isoprene and OH radicals at the HEC and subsequently collected on Teflon filters as described in our earlier work (Ebben et al, 2011a), was probed by SFG by pressing a fused silica window against a Teflon filter containing SOA particle material (Ebben et al, 2011b(Ebben et al, , 2012. Finally, field-derived SOA particle material, collected on nucleopore impactor substrates sampled using a micro-orifice uniformdeposit impactor (MOUDI) (Marple et al, 1991) in the central Amazon Basin from 9 April 2008 to 17 April 2008 at the site of the AMAZE-08 campaign (Martin et al, 2010a), was probed by SFG in the same way as the synthetic SOA particle material prepared at the HEC.…”
Section: Sample Configurationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chiral molecules do not possess a center of inversion, and, using the proper polarization combination, their SFG responses can be nonzero and originate from the surface and the bulk of the aerosol particle, depending on symmetry. Details regarding the role of chirality in SOA particles are discussed in our recently published work (Ebben et al, 2011;Martinez et al, 2011). We emphasize that the present work is carried out using the SSPpolarization combination, which is insensitive to molecular chirality and yields SFG signals from the CH oscillators that are located at the surface of the aerosol particles as opposed to those that are located in the bulk.…”
Section: Sfg Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%