1977
DOI: 10.1007/bf02661751
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stereological characterization of the interaction between interfaces and its application to the sintering process

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

1983
1983
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Density, surface area, and grain size are useful sintering metrics, since there is a natural trajectory evident over a range of materials, particle sizes, and processing techniques. [4][5][6][7][8] Crystalline materials first give up surface area to form grain boundaries at the interparticle bonds. Late in sintering, grain growth removes grain boundary area as densification continues.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Density, surface area, and grain size are useful sintering metrics, since there is a natural trajectory evident over a range of materials, particle sizes, and processing techniques. [4][5][6][7][8] Crystalline materials first give up surface area to form grain boundaries at the interparticle bonds. Late in sintering, grain growth removes grain boundary area as densification continues.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4,5,9,15,[18][19][20][21][22] Figure 2 illustrates such behavior using data for urania (UO 2 ) sintering at 1500°C for up to 2000 min. 19 The specific surface area is given relative to the starting surface area versus fractional density with a straight line fit to the data.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As expected, the values decrease gradually as the solid volume fraction increases. Linear decreases in S v sv with increasing solid volume fraction have been commonly observed in the sintering of powder metals 21,22 and ceramics. 20,23,24 Inspection of Eq.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…For comparison, the R values of the carbonyl iron compacts heated at 10°C/min and 1200°C/min to 1200°C and then sintered for 60 minutes are 1.95 and 1.81, respectively, in agreement with those reported for tungsten and copper in previous studies. [25,26] However, when compacts are heated at 10°C/min and 1200°C/min to 950°C and then held at that temperature for 5 minutes, the R values are only 1.51 and 1.59, respectively. These low values suggest that the grain boundary distributions in these compacts are close to the case with random intersections and no pinning effect due to the high porosity and fine grain size in the early stage of sintering.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Because such interaction may provide some insight into the effect of rapid heating, a quantitative metallography study was carried out. This method was postulated by Aigeltinger and Exner and was later modified by Patterson et al [25,26] By comparing the measured length of intersection between the grain boundary and the pore surface per unit volume, L M V ; and the calculated length expected for random intersections of the two surfaces per unit volume, L C V ; the ratio R of L M V to L C V gives the degree of excess pore-grain boundary contact and can be given by…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%