During the generation of rhythmic movements, most spinal neurons receive an oscillatory synaptic drive. The neuronal architecture underlying this drive is unknown, and the corresponding network size and sparseness have not yet been addressed. If the input originates from a small central pattern generator (CPG) with dense divergent connectivity, it will induce correlated input to all receiving neurons, while sparse convergent wiring will induce a weak correlation, if any. Here, we use pairwise recordings of spinal neurons to measure synaptic correlations and thus infer the wiring architecture qualitatively. A strong correlation on a slow timescale implies functional relatedness and a common source, which will also cause correlation on fast timescale due to shared synaptic connections. However, we consistently find marginal coupling between slow and fast correlations regardless of neuronal identity. This suggests either sparse convergent connectivity or a CPG network with recurrent inhibition that actively decorrelates common input.Movement is an essential part of our daily lives, and disorders of the motor system, such as spasticity, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, and spinal cord injury are particularly debilitating for individuals. Simple rhythmic movements, such as walking and breathing, have constituted models for fundamental aspects of the motor system. In spite of extensive investigations, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 the connectivity of the network responsible for generating the motor activity remains unknown. A circuit component, known as a central pattern generator (CPG), is believed to transmit command signals to motoneurons and local premotor interneurons. 7,8,9,10 Although the size of the respiratory motor network, i.e. the preBötzinger complex, 1, 11 is well-known, the size and wiring of other CPG networks are not well understood. A feedforward organization is often proposed between groups of neurons or modules, which exhibit alternating rhythmic bursting 12 (Fig. 1a). Common drive modules are thought to be small, e.g., the preBötzinger complex has only 600 neurons, 1 which provides rhythmic drive for the rest of the network. The projection is also believed to diverge onto a much larger population of receiving neurons. 13,14,15 Thus, the receiving neurons would share the same connections via a dense divergent connectivity ( Fig. 1b). Since the transmission is communicated by action potentials, which are precise in time, a dense connectivity will manifest as a strong temporal correlation between synaptic potentials in the receiving neurons, and this correlation can be verified experimentally through pairwise recordings. If the drive network is not a small but rather a large population, however, the receiver neurons are likely to collect sparse convergent input without correlation (Fig. 1c). Hence, the assessment of correlation CPG connectivity from decoupled timescales Extensor network Flexor network extensor Common drive Common drive flexor IN IN MN MN MN e x o r e x te ns or knee MN Dense Common drive Sparse c b ...