Stereoscopic 3D displays and human performance: A comprehensive review

McIntire, John P.; Havig, Paul R.; Geiselman, Eric E.

doi:10.1016/j.displa.2013.10.004

Cited by 194 publications

(131 citation statements)

References 62 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

123

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Additionally, it is well-documented that stereoscopic displays can cause discomfort such as simulator sickness or eye strain (Lambooij et al, 2009). On the other hand, a comprehensive review of empirical studies regarding stereo 3D suggested performance improvement in 60% of the cases considered, 25% of the cases it was a 'tie' between mono and stereo, and 15% was mixed/unclear (McIntire et al, 2014). McIntire et al (2014) state that stereo displays clearly offer benefits in depth-related spatial tasks, however, they caution that 25-50% of the population expresses some discomfort with stereo displays and they should be designed carefully.…”

Section: Human Factors -'Participant Type' or Individual And Group DImentioning

confidence: 99%

“…On the other hand, a comprehensive review of empirical studies regarding stereo 3D suggested performance improvement in 60% of the cases considered, 25% of the cases it was a 'tie' between mono and stereo, and 15% was mixed/unclear (McIntire et al, 2014). McIntire et al (2014) state that stereo displays clearly offer benefits in depth-related spatial tasks, however, they caution that 25-50% of the population expresses some discomfort with stereo displays and they should be designed carefully. There are also other basic perceptual problems with other kinds of 3D, e.g., we may not be able to perceive depth correctly if the light source is in the 'wrong' position (Bernabé Poveda & Çöltekin, 2014;Biland & Çöltekin, 2016;Imhof, 1967).…”

Section: Human Factors -'Participant Type' or Individual And Group DImentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

ON THE USABILITY AND USEFULNESS OF 3D (GEO)VISUALIZATIONS – A FOCUS ON VIRTUAL REALITY ENVIRONMENTS

Çöltekin¹,

Lokka²,

Zahner³

2016

Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ABSTRACT:Whether and when should we show data in 3D is an on-going debate in communities conducting visualization research. A strong opposition exists in the information visualization (Infovis) community, and seemingly unnecessary/unwarranted use of 3D, e.g., in plots, bar or pie charts, is heavily criticized. The scientific visualization (Scivis) community, on the other hand, is more supportive of the use of 3D as it allows 'seeing' invisible phenomena, or designing and printing things that are used in e.g., surgeries, educational settings etc. Geographic visualization (Geovis) stands between the Infovis and Scivis communities. In geographic information science, most visuo-spatial analyses have been sufficiently conducted in 2D or 2.5D, including analyses related to terrain and much of the urban phenomena. On the other hand, there has always been a strong interest in 3D, with similar motivations as in Scivis community. Among many types of 3D visualizations, a popular one that is exploited both for visual analysis and visualization is the highly realistic (geo)virtual environments. Such environments may be engaging and memorable for the viewers because they offer highly immersive experiences. However, it is not yet well-established if we should opt to show the data in 3D; and if yes, a) what type of 3D we should use, b) for what task types, and c) for whom. In this paper, we identify some of the central arguments for and against the use of 3D visualizations around these three considerations in a concise interdisciplinary literature review.

show abstract

Section: Human Factors -'Participant Type' or Individual And Group DImentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Human Factors -'Participant Type' or Individual And Group DImentioning

confidence: 99%

ON THE USABILITY AND USEFULNESS OF 3D (GEO)VISUALIZATIONS – A FOCUS ON VIRTUAL REALITY ENVIRONMENTS

Çöltekin¹,

Lokka²,

Zahner³

2016

Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…[3][4][5] Such devices have raised questions about whether stereoprojected images are a necessary feature of simulators. [6][7][8] This relates to the larger issue of whether an ability to perceive the information that arises specifically from a binocular view should be a prerequisite for surgical training. 9,10 Syrimi and Ali's recent review of the literature 1 concluded that 'stereopsis should not be considered a requirement for dental training. '…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

A three dimensional view of stereopsis in dentistry

et al. 2015

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Many works have shown that 3D images help users experience excitement, a feeling of presence, and enjoyment, and even performance advantages for depth-related tasks [1]. Despite the growing interest in 3D contents and technologies, few are concerned about viewers' perceptual and emotional responses to 3D stimuli.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparative analysis of affective and physiological responses to emotional movies

Kim

Cho

Park

2018

Hum. Cent. Comput. Inf. Sci.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

IntroductionThe three-dimensional movies are popular among today's generation. Following the success of the blockbuster movie Avatar, interest in 3D movies has increased significantly, leading to the production of more 3D movies. 3D televisions, 3D broadcasting and 3D Blu-ray movies also hit the market. More recently, virtual reality becomes a popular trend for consumers who want even more immersive 3D experiences. A few months ago Paramount Pictures launches the first virtual reality movie theater.Along with the rising popularity in 3D technologies, the biggest concern of creating 3D contents is to offer deeper and more meaningful experiences. Many works have shown that 3D images help users experience excitement, a feeling of presence, and enjoyment, and even performance advantages for depth-related tasks [1]. Despite the growing interest in 3D contents and technologies, few are concerned about viewers' perceptual and emotional responses to 3D stimuli.Much 3D related research is focused on technical factors, such as the fidelity of stereoscopic depth and reduction of visual discomforts while the viewer is watching 3D [2][3][4]. For example, subjective evaluation was used to compare visual fatigue induced by AbstractIn this research, we investigated on user's affective and physiological responses to the emotional movies. The emotional movies provide continuous feedback such as changes in saturation, brightness and contrast of the movie in response to users' emotional states. In the user study, the subjects watched the emotional movies, edited by fearful and joyful scenes, and presented in 2D and 3D formats. The subject's self-reported emotion responses and their physiological signals were analyzed. The results highlight the importance of scenes (such as, the color, tone, and brightness of the scene) than 2D or 3D format in understanding the impact of users' emotional responses. More physiological emotional changes, positive user responses and higher correlation rate between physiological and subjective responses were evident for joyful scene than fearful scene when presented in 3D format. Kim et al. Hum. Cent. Comput. Inf. Sci. (2018) et al. Hum. Cent. Comput. Inf. Sci. (2018) 8:15 2D and 3D high-definition television (HDTV) [5], but subjective evaluations often show considerable variation between individuals. RESEARCHPage 2 of 17 KimOn the other hand, physiological measurements provide a more objective evaluation for studying visual fatigue induced by a 3D display [6]. For example, the study on influence of 3D TV based on physiological signals measured the viewers' emotional states [7,8]. Results showed a correlation between the effect of physiological responses and emotional states. This indicates that physiological responses can be potentially ample indicators of emotionally engaging 3D video.Human emotion is a complex phenomenon with both affective and physiological components. The affective component refers to the users' subjective feeling while the physiological component refers to the physiological...

show abstract

Stereoscopic 3D displays and human performance: A comprehensive review

Cited by 194 publications

References 62 publications

ON THE USABILITY AND USEFULNESS OF 3D (GEO)VISUALIZATIONS – A FOCUS ON VIRTUAL REALITY ENVIRONMENTS

ON THE USABILITY AND USEFULNESS OF 3D (GEO)VISUALIZATIONS – A FOCUS ON VIRTUAL REALITY ENVIRONMENTS

A three dimensional view of stereopsis in dentistry

Comparative analysis of affective and physiological responses to emotional movies

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About

Stereoscopic 3D displays and human performance: A comprehensive review

Cited by 194 publications

References 62 publications

ON THE USABILITY AND USEFULNESS OF 3D (GEO)VISUALIZATIONS &ndash; A FOCUS ON VIRTUAL REALITY ENVIRONMENTS

ON THE USABILITY AND USEFULNESS OF 3D (GEO)VISUALIZATIONS &ndash; A FOCUS ON VIRTUAL REALITY ENVIRONMENTS

A three dimensional view of stereopsis in dentistry

Comparative analysis of affective and physiological responses to emotional movies

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About

ON THE USABILITY AND USEFULNESS OF 3D (GEO)VISUALIZATIONS – A FOCUS ON VIRTUAL REALITY ENVIRONMENTS

ON THE USABILITY AND USEFULNESS OF 3D (GEO)VISUALIZATIONS – A FOCUS ON VIRTUAL REALITY ENVIRONMENTS