“…As evident from the results shown in Scheme 3, the 1,1-silaboration turned out to be widely applicable for aw ide range of arene substituents at the alkyne terminus. Moreover, 3b was within reach in an identical yield to that shown for 3a.Notably,nitriles (3l), carbazoles (3n), or esters (3u)w ere all well-accommodated.I nterestingly,a ryl halides (3c, 3d, 3g, 3h and 3m), [18] sulfonates (3j), ethers (3f, 3i, 3k and 3p), and sulfides (3o), all common groups in crosscoupling, [19] did not interfere with our targeted 1,1-silaboration, hence opening up an orthogonal pathway for further derivatization through conventional transition-metal-catalyzed reactions.P articularly noteworthy is the observation that the 1,1-silaboration of 1a can be performed on ag ram scale,delivering 3a in 81 %yield without anoticeable erosion of yield or diastereoselectivity.The ability to obtain 3qand 3r as single products is particularly noteworthy if one takes into consideration the known tendency of silylboranes to enable C2-or C4-silylation of electron-poor azines under basic conditions through nucleophilic aromatic substitution (S N Ar) pathways. [11a] Substrates bearing more than one terminal alkyne can either be selectively (3s)o re xhaustively (3t) coupled with silylborane by carefully adjusting the stoichiometry of the reaction.…”