Selective Glycosylations: Synthetic Methods and Catalysts 2017
DOI: 10.1002/9783527696239.ch1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stereoselective Glycosylations – Additions to Oxocarbenium Ions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This structure (see Table 2) places all substituents in a position that allows for maximum stabilization of the thiacarbenium ion. As empirically established by Woerpel and co-workers 2024 and supported by previous computational studies, 15,16,2528 an oxocarbenium ion is best stabilized by an equatorial OMe substituent at C2 to allow for electron density donation by the axial C2–H2 bond, while the electron density of the ether group at C3 is nearest and most stabilizing to the electron-depleted anomeric center when placed axially. The same holds true for C5-OMe, which is positioned closest to the positive charge, when taking up the axial- gg -orientation in the E 3 envelope.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 61%
“…This structure (see Table 2) places all substituents in a position that allows for maximum stabilization of the thiacarbenium ion. As empirically established by Woerpel and co-workers 2024 and supported by previous computational studies, 15,16,2528 an oxocarbenium ion is best stabilized by an equatorial OMe substituent at C2 to allow for electron density donation by the axial C2–H2 bond, while the electron density of the ether group at C3 is nearest and most stabilizing to the electron-depleted anomeric center when placed axially. The same holds true for C5-OMe, which is positioned closest to the positive charge, when taking up the axial- gg -orientation in the E 3 envelope.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 61%
“…Many substitution patterns have been studied by the Woerpel laboratory, and both Woerpel and van der Marel, Codée, and their coworkers have published extensive reviews to which the reader is referred for broader coverage of this important topic. 24,68,72…”
Section: Facial Selectivity Of Nucleophilic Attack On Putative Glycmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reader is referred to several other books and reviews for complementary perspectives of the field. 924 The concepts of stereodirecting neighboring group participation and anchimeric assistance in glycosylation are not covered in this review.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 2 Which mechanism dominates, and, consequently, what product distribution is observed, depends on complex interactions between donor, acceptor, protecting groups, and reagents. 3 While many useful methods successfully leverage these interactions to generate certain glycosidic linkages in a stereoselective manner, 4 25 a general solution for the construction of broad classes of linkages has yet to emerge. 26 Here, we show that by matching the electronics of the leaving group to the reactivity of the glycosyl donor, it is possible to obtain S N 2-type glycosylations that afford products with high β-selectivity for a range of acceptors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%