Stereoselective Inhibition of High- and Low-Affinity Organic Cation Transporters

Abstract

Many drugs have chiral centers and are therapeutically applied as racemates. Thus, the stereoselectivity in their interactions with membrane transporters needs to be addressed. Here, we studied stereoselectivity in inhibiting organic cation transporters (OCTs) 1, 2, and 3 and the high-affinity monoamine transporters (MATs) NET and SERT. Selectivity by the inhibition of 35 pairs of enantiomers significantly varied among the three closely related OCTs. OCT1 inhibition was nonselective in almost all cases, whereas OCT2 was stereoselectively inhibited by 45% of the analyzed drugs. However, the stereoselectivity of the OCT2 was only moderate with the highest selectivity observed for pramipexole. The (R)-enantiomer inhibited OCT2 4-fold more than the (S)-enantiomer. OCT3 showed the greatest stereoselectivity in its inhibition. (R)-Tolterodine and (S)-zolmitriptan inhibited OCT3 11-fold and 25-fold more than their respective counterparts. Interestingly, in most cases, the pharmacodynamically active enantiomer was also the stronger OCT inhibitor. In addition, stereoselectivity in the OCT inhibition appeared not to depend on the transported substrate. For high-affinity MATs, our data confirmed the stereoselective inhibition of NET and SERT by several antidepressants. However, the stereoselectivity measured here was generally lower than that reported in the literature. Unexpectedly, the high-affinity MATs were not significantly more stereoselectively inhibited than the polyspecific OCTs. Combining our in vitro OCT inhibition data with available stereoselective pharmacokinetic analyses revealed different risks of drug–drug interactions, especially at OCT2. For the tricyclic antidepressant doxepine, only the (E)-isomer showed an increased risk of drug–drug interactions according to guidelines from regulatory authorities for renal transporters. However, most chiral drugs show only minor stereoselectivity in the inhibition of OCTs in vitro, which is unlikely to translate into clinical consequences.