2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.carres.2017.09.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stereoselective sialylation with O-trifluoroacetylated thiosialosides: hydrogen bonding involved?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
43
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 93 publications
0
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the course of their investigation into their supramer concept, numerous such studies were reported by Kononov and coworkers for various sialidation reactions. 286290 A curious inverse dependence on acceptor concentration in certain sialidation reactions was reported by Xing and coworkers and attributed to a change on supramer constitution. 332 Yet further examples have been provided by Kononov who showed, inter alia, the influence of donor concentration on the stereochemical outcome of the reaction of an arabinofuranosyl bromide with dibutyl phosphate (Scheme 65).…”
Section: Use Of Cation Clocks To Determine Molecularitymentioning
confidence: 91%
“…In the course of their investigation into their supramer concept, numerous such studies were reported by Kononov and coworkers for various sialidation reactions. 286290 A curious inverse dependence on acceptor concentration in certain sialidation reactions was reported by Xing and coworkers and attributed to a change on supramer constitution. 332 Yet further examples have been provided by Kononov who showed, inter alia, the influence of donor concentration on the stereochemical outcome of the reaction of an arabinofuranosyl bromide with dibutyl phosphate (Scheme 65).…”
Section: Use Of Cation Clocks To Determine Molecularitymentioning
confidence: 91%
“…The observed differences in specificity of antibodies generated against the two sets We have recently argued [103][104][105] that the sometimes observed profound influence of the nature of (functionalized) aglycon in a glycosyl acceptor may be related to formation of reaction solutions with modified structure that are featured by the presence of different supramolecular assemblies of reagents (supramers [102]) in solution. In a similar fashion, solutions of Ara6C2NH2-GNPs 3 with shorter and more hydrophobic С2 spacer aglycon might form more dense [106,107] supramers in aqueous solutions [102,[108][109][110] which eventually would form more clustered Ara6glycan domains on the surface of Ara6-GNPs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…We speculate that a similar hydrogen‐bond mediated complexation of glycosyl acceptor with oxacarbenium ion B (Scheme ) derived from glycosyl donor might be involved in glycosylation of glycosyl acceptor 20 by a mixture of N ‐TFA‐protected glucosamine N ‐phenyltrifluoroacetimidate 6α and 2‐trifluoromethyl‐oxazoline 7 . We have to stress that due to a strong electron‐withdrawing effect of trifluoromethyl group, which makes trifluoroacetamide proton present in N ‐TFA‐derivatives (including oxacarbenium ion B ) the sole strong hydrogen‐bond donor in the reaction mixture, yet another hydrogen‐bonding mode becomes feasible if not dominating. We propose that in case of NHTFA derivatives, unlike NHAc‐derivatives (vide supra), hydrogen‐bonding complexation between glycosyl donor and glycosyl acceptor would involve hydrogen atom of NHTFA at C‐2 and oxygen atom of the hydroxy group of glycosyl acceptor (intermediate B2 , Scheme , b ) and thus lead to the formation of 1,2‐ cis ‐glycoside.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We propose that in case of NHTFA derivatives, unlike NHAc‐derivatives (vide supra), hydrogen‐bonding complexation between glycosyl donor and glycosyl acceptor would involve hydrogen atom of NHTFA at C‐2 and oxygen atom of the hydroxy group of glycosyl acceptor (intermediate B2 , Scheme , b ) and thus lead to the formation of 1,2‐ cis ‐glycoside. Note that carbonyl oxygen of NHTFA group is a rather poor hydrogen‐bond acceptor in comparison with carbonyl oxygens of Ac and Bz groups . For this reason, the possibility of its participation in hydrogen‐bonding can be disregarded (at least in the first approximation).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%