1984
DOI: 10.1021/ja00337a067
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stereoselective substituent effects on conrotatory electrocyclic reactions of cyclobutenes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
109
0
2

Year Published

1998
1998
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 257 publications
(121 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
10
109
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This behaviour can be correlated to the classic torquoelectronic effect observed by Houk in the conrotatory opening-closure of four-membered rings. [8] The torquoelectronic effect is due to an interaction between the p orbitals of the substituent and the σ-forming bond in the transition state, and it is destabilizing when a donor group is placed in the inward position and stabilizing when a donor group is placed in the outward position. [9] In fact, in Table 1 the relative energies point out a decrease in the outward transition state energy (and related activation energy) and an increase of the inward transition state energy (and related activation energy) going from the trifluoromethyl group, which has the minimum donor effect in the series, to the amino group, which has the maximum donor effect.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This behaviour can be correlated to the classic torquoelectronic effect observed by Houk in the conrotatory opening-closure of four-membered rings. [8] The torquoelectronic effect is due to an interaction between the p orbitals of the substituent and the σ-forming bond in the transition state, and it is destabilizing when a donor group is placed in the inward position and stabilizing when a donor group is placed in the outward position. [9] In fact, in Table 1 the relative energies point out a decrease in the outward transition state energy (and related activation energy) and an increase of the inward transition state energy (and related activation energy) going from the trifluoromethyl group, which has the minimum donor effect in the series, to the amino group, which has the maximum donor effect.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[95] (Z,Z) (E,E) (in,in) (out,out) Rondan and Houk proposed in 1984 a widely accepted orbital model able to explain torquoselectivity. [96,97] In a nutshell, this model states that electron donor substituents at C 3 and C 4 preferentially rotate outward in order to maximize the stabilizing interaction with the HOMO of the breaking C 3 -C 4 bond and to minimize the repulsive interaction with the LUMO of the same bond. Electron acceptor substituents undergo the opposite effect, and, consequently, inward rotation is preferred.…”
Section: Reactivitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[14] We rationalized that in order to control the absolute direction of rotation of the orbitals in the ringclosing process (the torquoselectivity), [15] we needed to block one p-face of the delocalized anionic component of the reaction and rely on the stereospecificity of the electrocyclic process to direct the stereochemical outcome (Scheme 1 B). One way to accomplish this would be to exploit tight ionpairing in an organic solvent, using a chiral counterion to select one of the two faces of a pentadienyl anion or equivalent, and hence influence the enantioselectivity of the cyclization reaction.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%