1974
DOI: 10.3758/bf03213940
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stereospatial masking and aftereffect with normal and transformed random-dot patterns

Abstract: Masking and aftereffect in the perception of binocular depth were studied using random-dot sterograms as adaptation and target stimuli. Detection of the target was impaired by prior adaptation only when the two stimuli differed in disparity by less than 2 minarc. The masking function was unaffected by uniocular enlargement and blurring within the adaptation stimulus, but masking was no longer selective to disparity when the elements seen by the two eyes were reversed in brightness. The stereoscopic depth after… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

1982
1982
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 20 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nonetheless, the patterns of interference that have been observed are compatible with the notion that the visual system processes stereo-defined depth effectively as a third spatial dimension (e.g. Butler & Westheimer, 1978; Long & Over, 1974; Tyler & Kontsevich, 2005). We thus decided to use masks overlapping with the targets also in depth, i.e.…”
Section: Experiments 1: Natural Scenessupporting
confidence: 77%
“…Nonetheless, the patterns of interference that have been observed are compatible with the notion that the visual system processes stereo-defined depth effectively as a third spatial dimension (e.g. Butler & Westheimer, 1978; Long & Over, 1974; Tyler & Kontsevich, 2005). We thus decided to use masks overlapping with the targets also in depth, i.e.…”
Section: Experiments 1: Natural Scenessupporting
confidence: 77%